Same as Sergiu, I prefer shorter names but artifactId is not that bad. So 0.
Thanks,
Marius
On 04/05/2011 02:19 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Sergiu
Dumitriu<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:03 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
The proposal is to use artifactid as directory names.
Note that this is what I did for commons and rendering when I did the move to top level
project. You can check how it looks like here:
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/commons/
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/rendering/
I suggest we keep one strategy only for consistency.
Some discussion here too:
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/01/maven-tip-project-directories-and-ar…
I know there are some cons (see my comment in the link above) but overall I find it
simple to implement and with autocompletion not such a big issue.
WDYT?
0. I'd prefer shorter names, but I don't have a strong preference for
it. Either way works.
Same as Sergiu, I would prefer shorter names ; but no strong feelings either.
0
Jerome
If you don't like this then please propose an
alternative solution and remember that we'll need to refactor commons and rendering in
this case too.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs