6 Feb
2017
6 Feb
'17
10:57 a.m.
+1
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as
it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates
in
> one way or another to a release, and not just
developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the
committers to improve the quality
of
> the release and thus they should be
acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made
it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for
example. Luckily Caty also
commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through
commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could
do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the
RN during the development
(when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne