On 18 Mar 2016, at 21:23, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
Sure. Even so,
I still find it relevant enough to have this ("Extra")
"Information" docextra/viewer/etc. since it can be useful to display
important stuff (specially to advanced users) that don`t really deserve a
dedicated view.
Examples of stuff I`d personally like to see in that tab:
- Document Programming Right status (advanced)
- Document Script Right status (advanced)
- Document displayed with sheet X? (advanced)
- Document lock status?
- If it's terminal or not
Other ideas:
- Computed permissions (with a click since it can take some time to compute) showing who
has the various rights on this page (to view, edit, comment, delete, etc)
- Other metadata of XWikiDocument:
-- Syntax
-- Content author (vs author and creator) and content update date (vs creation date and
update date) (advanced)
-- custom class (advanced)
-- whether the doc holds an XClass and which one (advanced)
-- list of xobjects (advanced)
-- default template (advanced)
Thanks
-Vincent
- etc.
>
> Of course we can work on the naming if you like... tough it will be tough
> to find a better name IMO :)
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Eduard
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I agree that View Source could be moved in Information.
>>>>
>>>> Does it mean you’re ok with the other bullet point entries?
>>>>
>>>> Also I didn’t mention it, but this proposal means reorganizing the VMs
>>>> (menu_content.vm and shortcuts.cm) since right now the vm for
>> displaying
>>>> the second part of the More Actions menu is called shortcuts.vm and
> its
>>>> first line is:
>>>>
>>>> #if (!$docextralinks && !$docextras)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Caty
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here’s the outcome of a discussion I had with Caty/Edy on IRC +
>> addition
>>>>>> of some elements of my own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idea is to clarify our strategy for the “More Actions” menu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So here’s a proposal:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * The More Actions menus is actually a "More" menu
since it doesn't
>>>>>> contain only actions. Specifically it contains 2 types of links:
>>>>>> ** Actions such as Export, Annotate, Print, Share
>>>>>> ** Information about the page (they're not actions):
History,
>>>>>> Comments/Annotations, Children, Attachments
>>>>>> * The "View Source" entry is not placed correctly and
should be
> moved
>> to
>>>>>> the information section
>>>>>> * The "Information" entry could be renamed or be made
more specific
>>>> since
>>>>>> the whole section of the menu is about information about the
page.
> It
>>>> used
>>>>>> to contain children but that's been separated so all it
contains now
>> are
>>>>>> included pages and backlinks. These could be transformed into 2
>> viewers:
>>>>>> one for includes pages and one for backlinks
>>>>>> * The extradocs tabs do not need to match the information section
of
>> the
>>>>>> "More" menu. We only display in the tabs the most
important actions.
>>>>>> * Idea: In order not to have too many tabs and to simplify the
UI,
> we
>>>>>> could decide to remove the Information one and have
"Included Pages"
>> and
>>>>>> "Backlinks" only as menu entries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> -Vincent