20 May
2011
20 May
'11
11:39 a.m.
Also I think I'd prefer using the latest version from derby rather than the repackaged
version by Oracle...
-Vincent
On May 20, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK?
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent