On 14 Jan 2016 at 14:45:26, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
(valicac@gmail.com(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Well why doesn't belong anymore? You could just
mark it as "Idea”.
It’ll never be implemented there because we decided that the repos of the xwiki github org
are for core stuff only (see my comment on the issue). So why mislead people into thinking
it might be implemented when we know it won’t?
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:42 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
> Hi Caty,
>
> I have probably not expressed myself correctly. The goal is not to list
> all Ideas :)
>
> The goal is that we need to separate stuff that is platform from stuff
> that is NOT platform. Regarding XWIKI-1103 for example, I’ve closed it but
> it’s a pity because 1) it’s not done and 2) it’s a good idea. It just
> doesn’t belong in the XWIKI JIRA project anymore.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
> On 14 Jan 2016 at 14:39:32, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) (valicac(a)gmail.com
> (mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
>
> > -0
> >
> > I think we should just mark correctly issues with 'Idea' instead of
'New
> > feature' like in the example you gave
> >
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-1103
> >
> > If they are marked correctly then you can easily make a query and
> reference
> > them to contributors and students.
> >
> > For example this query
> >
>
https://jira.xwiki.org/issues/?jql=issuetype%20%3D%20Idea%20AND%20status%20…
> > will list all the open ideas in the Top Level Projects.
> >
> > For example: from the 110 issues opened, there are:
> > 83 on Platform (13 on Templates, 5 on Model, 4 on Rendering, 4 on
> Flamingo,
> > etc.)
> > 13 on Rendering
> > 7 on Enterprise
> > 5 on Commons
> > 2 on Infrastructure
> >
> > The advantage is that the components and projects are marked correctly
> and
> > we already did this job and we don't have to move them all in the new
> > project, create new components, etc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caty
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Thomas Mortagne > > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure about that, it's still OK to have idea in XWIKI jira
> > > project as long as the idea is specifically about core stuff.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
> > > wrote:
> > > > I forgot to mention that this means removing the “Idea” issue type
in
> > > the XWIKI jira project IMO.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > -Vincent
> > > >
> > > > On 14 Jan 2016 at 11:02:44, vincent(a)massol.net (vincent(a)massol.net
> > > (mailto:vincent@massol.net)) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi devs,
> > > >>
> > > >> Since we’ve decided that the xwiki github organization will
contain
> > > only core extensions and that we want to move non-core extensions
> outside
> > > (most likely to the contrib github organization), and since in contrib
> each
> > > project has its own jira project, I think we need a jira project for
> people
> > > to propose ideas.
> > > >>
> > > >> Of course we could also have installed the Idea app (
> > >
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Ideas) on
>
xwiki.org
> > > but since we manager our issues with JIRA we’d have to copy them to
> jira
> > > anyway.
> > > >>
> > > >> So my proposal is to create a top level JIRA project called
“Ideas”
> and
> > > to document it on
> > >
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Contributing.
> > > >>
> > > >> This will also allow us to move issues such as
> > >
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-1103 (Bookmarks feature), which are
> > > currently in the XWIKI JIRA project to the Ideas project and can be
> used as
> > > a place where contributors or GSOC students can get ideas from.
> > > >>
> > > >> Of course if someone suggest an idea that is something core,
we’d
> move
> > > it to the XWIKI Jira project ourselves.
> > > >>
> > > >> WDYT?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >> -Vincent