Re: [xwiki-devs] Issue on l10n with history

On 01/24/2013 12:03 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > Working on l10n change to custom mapping showed up an issue with the l10n > history. > We have a huge history table with 2,3M lines (as well as an activity > stream) and we use the history table for extracting contributor statistics. > > However looking at it more closely shows that the source of most data in > the history table is useless. > See here a grouping by dates showing that localisation of already close to > 2M lines in 6 month in 2012. > > | 201201 | 318346 | > | 201202 | 311403 | > | 201203 | 728703 | > | 201204 | 271657 | > | 201205 | 296384 | > | 201206 | 120463 | > > Here is an example of history for an entry > > mysql> select > xwr_author,xwr_version1,xwr_version2,xwr_date,xwr_comment,cast(xwr_isdiff > as unsigned), length(xwr_patch) from xwikircs where xwr_docid=596494851 ; > +-----------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------------+-------------+------------------------------+-------------------+ > | xwr_author | xwr_version1 | xwr_version2 | xwr_date > | xwr_comment | cast(xwr_isdiff as unsigned) | length(xwr_patch) | > +-----------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------------+-------------+------------------------------+-------------------+ > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 1 | 1 | 2010-02-23 11:38:27 > | | 1 | 163 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 2 | 1 | 2010-02-23 11:40:26 > | | 1 | 330 | > | XWiki.rbuj | 3 | 1 | 2010-03-04 00:24:24 > | | 1 | 189 | > | XWiki.rbuj | 4 | 1 | 2010-03-04 01:02:52 > | | 1 | 223 | > | XWiki.rbuj | 5 | 1 | 2010-07-30 01:12:58 > | | 0 | 5026 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 6 | 1 | 2012-01-23 11:40:25 > | | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 7 | 1 | 2012-01-23 11:58:25 > | | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 1 | 2012-01-23 13:31:52 > | | 1 | 234 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 2 | 2012-01-23 15:36:02 > | Prepared | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 3 | 2012-01-24 02:01:12 > | Prepared | 0 | 5670 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 4 | 2012-01-25 02:04:00 > | Prepared | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 5 | 2012-01-26 02:02:29 > | Prepared | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 6 | 2012-01-27 02:01:18 > | Prepared | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 7 | 2012-02-04 02:01:08 > | Prepared | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 8 | 2012-02-07 02:02:03 > | Prepared | 0 | 5670 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 9 | 2012-02-08 02:01:20 > | Prepared | 1 | 115 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 10 | 2012-02-14 02:01:07 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 11 | 2012-02-28 02:01:32 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 12 | 2012-03-03 02:01:20 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 13 | 2012-03-14 02:01:50 > | Prepared | 0 | 5671 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 14 | 2012-03-14 18:23:06 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 15 | 2012-03-14 18:32:38 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 16 | 2012-03-14 18:37:17 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 17 | 2012-03-24 02:01:34 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 18 | 2012-03-26 16:40:35 > | Prepared | 0 | 5671 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 19 | 2012-03-28 02:01:23 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 20 | 2012-03-29 02:01:45 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 21 | 2012-04-11 02:01:36 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 22 | 2012-04-19 15:20:10 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 24 | 2012-04-29 02:01:45 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 25 | 2012-05-04 18:55:30 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 26 | 2012-05-04 19:02:09 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 27 | 2012-05-10 02:04:36 > | Prepared | 1 | 116 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 28 | 2012-05-30 02:02:08 > | Prepared | 0 | 5671 | > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator | 8 | 29 | 2012-06-07 10:44:28 > | Prepared | 0 | 5782 | > +-----------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------------+-------------+------------------------------+-------------------+ > > http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XE/XEXWikiCoreResources_2107067965_cor… > > Most entries are "no changes" and have been cause by the L10NUpdater which > wrongefully saved the document with no changes. I believe this must have > been fixed (by Thomas M.?) mid 2012. > > Now the 2M lines impact performance significantly and loads the DB for > nothing (and in the activity stream as well). > > I suggest we clean up the history and activity stream. We have 2 > possibilities: > > For xwikircs: > > 1/ Clean up only the bad data from XWikiTranslator when there are no > changes: > > This is complicated as you need to verify if the change is actually a > change and you cannot do that just with sql queries. It could be very long > > 2/ Clean up old data from pre-201206 from XWikiTranslator > > Simpler if it is safe to delete by date in the DB. After discussion with > sergui this is a bit complicated because you need to make sure you don't > delete the latest full version before the versions you keep. So you would > have to do it by API which will take ages. > > 3/ Clean up up old data from pre-201206 from all users > > This is simpler as you can safely delete from the database everything older > than a certain versions. Cleans-up even more but would loose contributor > statistics unless we store 2012 contributor counts in an alternate table > which would then be regularly updated +1 for 3/, without the extra stats table yet. See below. Technically, we could also use /2, since we'll still have history summary (who changed when), but some actual versions won't be retrievable. Is the actual revision important? IMHO, only if we want to investigate some foul play. > In any case we should probably create this intermediary table for > statistics as it would be much faster anyway. > > For activitystream: > > 1/ Clean up old data from XWikiTranslator 201206 or earlier > > 2/ Clean up old date from everybody 201206 or earlier +1 for 1/ > What value do we see in the l10n history and actvity stream and which > solutions do the other commiters suggest ? > > I would say it's interesting for contributor statistics (counting number of > contribution by translators) but beyond that we can delete the data. > So we would fix that by storing monthly statistics in a table and updating > the latest 2 month through a scheduler job. This means that we can also > delete history over 2 month. We can get contributor activity from the activity stream, independently from the RCS table. Since the activity stream doesn't have inter-version dependencies like the RCS does, we can freely discard irrelevant rows from it, and use the remaining valid data. The same information is present in the activity stream and in the RCS table: who did what, when, and where. I mean, this is a good fast solution for the moment. We could still make a custom statistics data structure for translation contributors, but that would take longer, and thus it delays the migration of the l10n wiki to a newer version, and delays the performance improvement that we'd gain by dropping data. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs