10 Jul
2009
10 Jul
'09
9 a.m.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean
<jean-vincent(a)drean.org>wrote;wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Pascal
Voitot<pascal.voitot.dev(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In fact, I quite agree with your choice, I just wanted to be sure about
that...
I wanted to have a main document built just by including other documents and
to be able to edit those documents' sections directly from the main
document.
But I found a solution for my case which respects XWiki behavior: why not
directly integrate the documents I want to edit into the main document. So,
instead of including another document into my main document, I use a script
that reads a document template and pastes its content into my main document.
Pascal
Hello,
I can now edit sections on my 1.9RCx (modifications where light so I
could
retrofit them)
But when I do sthg like:
{{include document="MyDocument"/}}
I don't see the section editing for the included content.
Is it the default behavior not to propose section editing when the
document
is included into another one?
Yes, the rule is: if a title is output by a macro (include, velocity,
etc) don't provide a link to edit the section.
The reason we forbid editing of section generated by scripts
(velocity, etc) is quite obvious, these titles can be generated and
thus we wouldn't be able to find them in the wiki source. About titles
coming from included documents, from a usability standpoint it could
be misleading to be redirected to the edition of another document.
Note that the behavior of section editing with xwiki/2.0 mimics the
xwiki/1.0 behavior.
Thanks,
JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs