10 Dec
2012
10 Dec
'12
10:26 a.m.
+1,
Thanks,
Eduard
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
+1, sounds good
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
because
On 12/08/2012 09:12 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/commit/7b45b48de1c6915294736dfddda74…
Hi devs,
This week end I've been (at last) experimenting with Mockito (
http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html)
and it's been successful so far :)
I've converted a first test to use it as a demonstrator of its power (
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XCOMMONS-316):
I'd like to propose to start using it and start writing our tests with
it
since:
* It's very easy to use. I was able to very
simply migrate an existing
test to it
> * It makes our tests much more readable to read and maintain IMO 1) there's less boilerplate code, 2) it
provides default values for mocks
and 3) no more of ugly expectations syntax
or
* It's powerful, just see
http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html
* It's actively maintained and developed, see
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/downloads/list and
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/source/list and
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/people/list
After we've written/converted a few tests (let's say in 1 month or so)
we
can really decide if we like it and make it our official mocking tool if we should go back to JMock (but I have little
doubts ;)).
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
WDYT?
Looks good, +1.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs