Thanks
-Vincent
PS: We discussed the idea of a backward compatibility param but we decided against since
it would think complex and not help that much in the end.
On Oct 7, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Oct 7, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi guys,
Ok here's second version taking into account Denis and Marius comments:
* Have a {{display}} macro which is equivalent to context=new and resolve=source (ie
links resolved on the reference being displayed)
* Have a compatibility mode for the {{include}} macro with the following behavior:
** {{include}} in non-compatibility mode is equivalent to context=current and
resolve=current (ie links resolve on the including document)
I forgot to mention the following point:
** The {{include}} macro has a new "resolve" parameter (the "context"
one is deprecated) which can be "current" or "source".
This is needed since there are use cases both resolve=current and resolve=source for the
include macro. Once again the context param has nothing to do with how links/images are
resolved. And again the writer of a page isn't necessarily the same as the person
who's going to include your page.
Thanks
-Vincent
> ** {{include}} in compatiiblity mode is equivalent to context=current and
resolve=source (the default we have now and which we need to not break people)
> * We would have a rendering.macro.include.compatibility configuration property
> * We would set that property to true by default for 3.3 to give some time for people
to adjust
> * We would set that property to false by default for 3.4
> * Deprecate "document" parameter for the include macro and add a new
"reference" parameter + a new "type" parameter (I forgot that one in
my first email). The "type" parameter represents the Entity Reference Type.
> * Also add a "type" parameter for the display macro (I forgot that one in
my first email)
> * Have the "type" parameter default to "document".
>
> Some additional notes:
> * The person writing a page is not necessarily the same as the person writing an
include.
> * With the new sheet mechanism there are a lot less use cases for the include in
compatibility mode.
>
> Please vote again.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> As you know in XE 3.0 we've changed the behavior for resolving local
links/attachments when they're included using the {{include}} macro (they're now
resolved against the included document instead of the including document).
>>
>> Now there might be some use cases (pretty rare IMO but they exist) where
you'd want the links to be resolved against the including document. Here's a use
case: you have a sheet document that references an image called image.png and you want
that the including document provides it (like an Abstract in Java! ;)).
>>
>> So we've brainstormed with Thomas and here's our proposal:
>>
>> * Introduce a new {{display reference="…"/}} macro. This macro will
*execute* the passed reference in its own context (it'll do what {{include
context="new"…}} was doing before). It'll be located in the new display
module.
>> * Deprecate the "context" parameter of the {{include}} macro. The
reason is that calling with context=new is not an include, it's a display.
>> * Add a new "resolve" parameter for the {{include}} macro with possible
values = "current" | "source", with a default value of
"source". resolve=source means that the links/attachments are resolved against
the source (ie the document being included). Using resolve=current means that you want the
links/attachments resolved against the including document.
>>
>> Pros:
>> * Clearly separate the 2 use cases: display and include
>> * Make the include macro simple (a single "resolve" parameter)
>> * Use the new display module as it should be and start the direction of having
displayer macros for displaying all types of entities
>>
>> Note: In the future we'll also want to deprecate the "document"
parameter of the include macro in favor of a more generic "reference" parameter,
which will allow the macro to include other types of entities (such as an object property
for ex).
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org