20 Oct
2009
20 Oct
'09
2:32 p.m.
On 10/20/2009 02:16 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand why you've used "transient". Can you explain?
Sorry, "mutable servlet field" was not the error. It was "A
non-serializable
value is stored into a non-transient field of a serializable class". My
mistake.
This is why I added the transient field thinking it would fix the problem.
It did fix the problem but I wasn't sure if that is the correct thing to do.
Thanks.
Why don't you make them static? Instance members of a singleton class is
roughly equivalent to static members.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/