On 30 Oct 2017, at 12:27, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Caty,
Thanks!
There’ s something I don’t understand. Sometimes you have 2 icons and
sometimes only 1.
There is only 1 icon if the action is done by the "Pages" app, coming from
XWiki.
I've considered that this is the main/default app, so we don't display it.
It's the default.
So if you have created, edited, delete, commented on a normal page, you get
just the event action.
If the page is special, coming from a particular application, then you have
an additional icon, marking the application.
For me we always need 2 icons:
* one to represent the application (e.g. Pages
app, Blog app, etc)
* one to represent the event (e.g. for the Paged app: Create, Modify,
Delete, Comment. For the Blog app: Publish a blog post)
So if we display the avatar this means 3 icons: one for the avatar, one
for the app and one for the event. Maybe that’s a bit too much.
Right now, on the proposals I see, I find it very confusing and I can
never figure out which is the app and which is the event.
I think I would prefer the following:
* On the left, avatar in big + app in smaller on top of it
* On the right, icon for the event. Actually the icon could be in addition
to the “text” (i.e. “edited by”, “published by”, “commented by”, “deleted
by”, etc) or we could drop the icon for the event and only keep the text.
I wouldn't drop the event icon since that's the most important piece of
information now.
I would not drop it but it’s already contained in the text on the right so that’s
duplication.
I’d use the avatar + the app and leave the event icon on the right or simply drop it in
favor of the text (either one).
The grouping is done by page and by event.
You want to know if someone deleted a new entry or just edited in a rapid
way, without the need to read the text.
I’d prefer to see who did something and what they modified. That’s really how I use
XWiki’s AS the most personally.
If the text is not visual enough the event icon is ok too but I wouldn’t put it on the
left.
In any case, you need consistency and all entries need to look the same. We must not have
special cases as it makes it very hard to understand.
I don’t like the generic group image, it breaks the nice UI with avatars. We could maybe
resize the avatars and display up to 4 and if beyond then display some continuations
symbol.
Now I haven't created versions for all the
combinations, but we should
decide if:
- we want user focused vs. event focused layout
- expanded version should have users or events on the left;
- the summary should contain avatars or not for the users (important when
there is a single user that did the event);
- if / when we combine the users (when we have more than 2/3 users; always;
I am lacking some information in order to get some statistical decisions.
For example, in practice:
- we have more individual events or more events done by multiple people?
- how common is to group also events? the example with blog published that
also has the create. Do we really need to display them? Also when creating
an user profile we launch a multitude of edit events, should all those be
displayed?
Regarding the user vs. event focused layout: it's just in the layout and
what we display on the first position, since I've kept the current
page/event grouping that is currently implemented. The decision depends on
how everyone is using the wiki: are they more interested in activity being
done on the wiki or who actually did that activity?
Both are needed and it depends on the usage I guess. My feeling is that humans are good at
relationships in a group and a picture speaks more than a generic icon for an app. You
know who you work with, you know people you like, you know who you consider is a stranger,
etc and you’ll want to check the diff and dive further based on that. The fact that the
avatar is shown prominently will help that.
Thanks
-Vincent
I like to see who did what, but if the Notifications
implementation will
always group users and we will get the Group icon, than this might not be
very nice.
Thanks,
Caty
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>> On 27 Oct 2017, at 17:31, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So these are some more iterations for the notifications layout
>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
> NotificationsImprovements9xTypes
>>
>> I've played with User centered vs. Event centered and variants for
>> displaying the avatars, user names and event names.
>>
>> Let me know what version you prefer. Also you can fork the prototypes if
>> you want to make some small changes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Caty
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 11:24, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-24 11:12 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Guillaume,
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 10:58, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any news on this? I'd like to implement this quickly because
9.10 is
>>>>> coming
>>>>>> :)
>>>>>
>>>>> This the current status:
>>>>> * Caty proposed some improved layout for displaying notifications
>>>>> * I commented about the need to display event + type, and about the
> need
>>>>> to have a link to see the diff. I also mentioned that we need to
work
> on
>>>>> the mail template display
>>>>> * Caty replied and updated her proposal to take into account those
>>>>> comments.
>>>>> * I kind of like Caty’s proposal focused on the user. We want to
favor
>>>>> contributions and I think it helps. It also makes the UI more
> appealing
>>>>> visually.
>>>>> * You mentioned that you’d prefer a proposal more focused on the
event
>>>>> rather than the user
>>>>> * Thomas agrees with you
>>>>> * Edy mentioned some extra points
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have also mentioned that the diff we propose is too technical for
> many
>>>> users.
>>>
>>> Yes and we have 4 solutions:
>>>
>>> * Solution 1: make it simpler to understand for everyone
>>> * Solution 2: have a wiki admin UI level option to select whether to
>>> include diff or not in the default template + user-level profile UI
> option
>>> (ie. per user)
>>> * Solution 3: have a singe button in the mail, that, when clicked,
>>> displays the diff (which is hidden by default)
>>> * Solution 4: implement 2 mail templates (one for simple users and one
> for
>>> advanced users) and let the users choose in their profile which one they
>>> want to receive + have a wiki admin UI level option to decide which is
> the
>>> default when not overridden by the user.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> So I guess we need to decide about whether we show the avatar as in
>>> Caty’s
>>>>> proposal or not, right? Is that what you’re asking about Guillaume?
>>>>>
>>>>> On my side, I don’t see the issue in displaying the user avatar
large
> vs
>>>>> small. The events are still ordered by page events.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-23 13:19 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that you have a mail template for the notifications too.
It's
>>>>>>>
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/
>>>>>>> 83b76ed4c26954aa2755bbdce23b32c41725ac06/xwiki-platform-
>>>>>>> core/xwiki-platform-notifications/xwiki-platform-
>>>>>>> notifications-ui/src/main/resources/XWiki/Notifications/
>>>>>>> MailTemplate.xml#L23 but it's not documented yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This mail template allows you to customize the header and the
footer
>>> of
>>>>>>> the email, but not the actual content.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To be precise, each *event type* can have its own template
or
> failback
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the default one
(
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/
>>>>>>> acdf68f4c0d20a9b44ea48eec4df808e22c54548/xwiki-platform-
>>>>>>> core/xwiki-platform-web/src/main/webapp/templates/
>>>>>>> notification/email/default.html.vm)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So it's a template *per event type* and it's not
linked to any user
>>>>>>> choice. But we could add some options in the default template
for
>>>>> example.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-17 16:23 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2017, at 07:16, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some ideas.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have feedback about the fact the diff is way too
technical for
>>>>> users.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Example: "What does it means???"
https://img15.hostingpics.net/
>>>>>>>>> pics/670307example1.png
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So we could hide this in a "technical
details" link.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That’s one option but there’s another which is to provide
the
> ability
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> choose which mail template to use in the Admin and
provide several
>>>>>>>> templates for different needs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For example for the
xwiki.org watchlist we absolutely
need to be
>>> able
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> see the diffs without clicking a “technical details” link
for each
>>>>>>>> notification. It could be ok if there’s a single
“technical
> details”
>>>>> link
>>>>>>>> for ALL notifications that shows all diffs at once.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The "details" link could be replaced by a
"more" link, with a very
>>>>>>>>> simplified diff (the complete diff would go the the
technical
>>> details
>>>>>>>> view).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the body of the event, in addition with the title
of the
>>> document,
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> could add some extracts of the diff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Example taken on gmail:
>>>>>>>>>
https://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/763456example2.png
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope it helps,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-12 15:38 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looks nice. Does it work in all mail clients that
support HTML?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like an option to show the details for
all events as
> otherwise
>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>> too painful to have to open all one by one (for
the use case when
>>> you
>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>> to check everything).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Same as Guillaume: not all events are
page-related events. So we
>>> need
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> handle those too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 Oct 2017, at 15:03, Guillaume Delhumeau
<
>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> First of all, it looks very nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now, you said the events are displayed like
in the
> notifications,
>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> the notifications they are ordered by dates,
not by pages. Does
>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> proposal imply to change the ordering? What
about events that do
>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> concern any page (like: "a new wiki has
been created" or "a new
>>>>> XWiki
>>>>>>>>>>> version is available")? We don't
have such events for now but we
>>>>> plan
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> have some soon. We could display them last
for example.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice CSS expand!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks you,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-12 14:47 GMT+02:00 Ecaterina Moraru
(Valica) <
>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a proposal for the Notifications
mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>>>>>>>>>>> NotificationsImprovements9xEmail
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've continued with the
'user' avatar focused proposal, since
>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>> currently focused on the email template.
If we drop the user
>>> avatar
>>>>>>>>>> (since
>>>>>>>>>>>> we group multiple users) then we can have
the event/app icon
>>>>> instead
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> avatar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What I want to have feedback on is the
email layout,
>>> functionality
>>>>>>>> (tree
>>>>>>>>>>>> navigation, details expanding) and
styling.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You can play with the Prototype
>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://jsfiddle.net/risherry/cj25759w/embedded/#Result
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If we were to translate to the mail
template, there are still
>>> some
>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be tested (like translating the CSS
selectors into inline,
>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>> email clients we support, etc.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Caty
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:51 PM,
Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 17:32 GMT+02:00 Ecaterina
Moraru (Valica) <
>>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:50 AM,
Guillaume Delhumeau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-02 18:09 GMT+02:00
Vincent Massol <
> vincent(a)massol.net
>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2017, at
18:08, Vincent Massol <
> vincent(a)massol.net
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2017, at
18:05, Vincent Massol <
>>> vincent(a)massol.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another
feedback/questions:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Is the avatar
icon clickable and leading to the user
>>>>> profile?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * We need a way
to link directly to the diff, at least
> for
>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that the user can see
what was modified (as we have
>>>>> currently
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AS)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Maybe “2 hours ago”
is not precise enough. In your
>>> example I
>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created and modified the
Roadmap page but they both say “2
>>>>> hours
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn’t I be able to
see how far away both events were
>>> done?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My understanding is that
events are grouped by app+type but
>>> not
>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anymore (for page events)
and thus you can have 3 events
>>>>>>>> displayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same page, f.ex:
Creation, Modification, Deletion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you could also have
different users grouped in the same
>>>>>>>> composite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. So when you display
the details, it would be nice to
>>> show
>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made each event, and I see
you have removed this info.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The focus of this proposal is on
user, compared to the old
> one,
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the app/doc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Close to what we have on
Facebool. So it didn't made sense
> that
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> say
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a page has been edited by
vmassol, and that the details
>>> showcase
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple user actually did the
edit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Facebook, you have it actually:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://pasteboard.co/GOioRAT.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On XWiki, we have the following
(already implemented):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://pasteboard.co/GOiqgYf.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct
2017, at 18:01, Vincent Massol <
>>> vincent(a)massol.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct
2017, at 17:54, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Event
Type: BlogPostPublishedEvent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NotificationsImprovements9x#HEventTypes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok thanks,
had missed this since I was reading from top
> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stopped at the overview
:)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I
don’t think it scales since it means one
> unique
>>>>> icon
>>>>>>>>>>>>> per
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> combination of app type +
event type.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would
scale better is two icons: one for the app
> type
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the event type.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example
imagine that the Blog app had the following
>>>>>>>> events:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * When a blog
post is published
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * When a blog
post is created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * When a blog
post is removed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn’t
be able to use the RSS icon to represent
> the
>>> 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> events.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW the RSS
icon isn’t necessarily representative of the
>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> app.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of apps can have a
RSS feed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s the
main remark I have: it’s going to be harder
> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> harder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find unique icons as we
had more events to apps, especially
>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 icon that is supposed
to combine both app type + event
>>> type.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon,
Oct 2, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Vincent Massol <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vincent(a)massol.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
Caty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:21, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I've created some improvements suggestions for our
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Notifications
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UI, see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NotificationsImprovements9x
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Re
the overview, I don’t see where you mention the
> app?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For
example, could you show how a new Blog post would
> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> displayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
differentiate that for example from a Page creation or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modification?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Caty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development
Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org
project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer
at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau
(guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki
SAS
>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>>>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project