19 Mar
2019
19 Mar
'19
2:01 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:47 PM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Another point:
* There are only recurring donations. I believe we also need one shot
ones, don’t you think?
IMO I prefer more the recurring donations, since the members can always
stop the donation. So recurring always includes one time donations.
In order to prevent selection paralysis we should not have that many
options to choose from. I've already proposed 5, but I'm sure we will have
at least 4. If we also add the one time donations is going to add up.
Thanks
-Vincent
only…
which is low. Is it 1 issue per release? Also needs some limits on
the complexity (such as < 2 days of work). I would put 2000 euros for 2
days of work since the goal is not to do service work but to sponsor the
sofware and by doing so you get a reward. So it has to be higher than if
you were just paying for an issue. So I would put 2000 euros for max of 2
days issues per month. 1000 euros for 1 day is also possible but reduces a
lot the type of issues that can be taken.
On 19 Mar 2019, at 13:46, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Caty and all,
> On 19 Mar 2019, at 12:11, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Please vote on the Tiers we should have on XWiki's OpenCollective page
https://goo.gl/forms/qTDsxt1GvpU0ET3n2
* What is a member?
* For me the Tshirt is not part of the title but it’s a reward.
* Issue sponsor isn’t defined well enough. You seem to indicate 1 issue * For all of them I find the description too
weak. We need to explain
where the money goes in more details IMO. Also what about
XWiki SAS’s
current sponsoring. Why would anyone want to give when XWiki SAS gives
already? This is not explained.
* Support Sponsor is interesting but it should be
1000 euros per month
and be limited to 2 hours IMO.
Regarding Issue sponsor and Support Sponsor there’s an issue though.
It’s not
clear where the money goes and what it’ll be used for. Imagine,
for example, that Clemens does an Issue sponsor. Does some part of the
money go to him? If not, what is it used for and how does it benefit
Clemens globally?
So I really think we need to explain what the money is going to be used
in
details, on top of what XWiki SAS already sponsors. That should be our
first step IMO.
Thanks
-Vincent
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:26 PM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
>> I’d say that we should start with opencollective for now.
>>
>> We can always add more later on. But the importance is to get started.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 16:39, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> For the record: OpenCollective's 'competitor'
>> https://communitybridge.org,
>>> still in early access, but launched by Linux Foundation (
>>> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/)
>>>
>>> We could use the CommunityBridge in parallel with OpenCollective.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:20 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ping
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:22 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a proposal for the content we would have if we were to
create
>> an
>>>>> OpenCollective account for XWiki.
>>>>> Take a look at
>>>>>
https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective
>>>>>
>>>>> The issues we need to solve / validate are:
>>>>> A. Decide on the URL name (xwiki is already taken by XWiki SAS)
>>>>> B. See if XWiki SAS can act like our Fiscal host
>>>>> C. Validate the tiers and content
>>>>>
>>
https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective#HTiers
>>>> (we might need more details on how the "Bug Fixer" works in
case we
> agree
>>>> to it)
>>>>
>>>> Let me know what you think,
>>>> Caty
>>>>
>>>>
>
>