16 Mar
2010
16 Mar
'10
10:51 a.m.
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to move this topic forward. Thus I've now created a draft of the
XWiki.org Governance that gathers what I had proposed at
http://markmail.org/message/fxqvprtbb5vyog6g
The Governance page is currently at:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Governance
Sounds good overall. As one could expect, the 2 gray areas to me are:
"The notion of active is currently left to the appreciation of the XWiki
Committers."
and
"Right now the definition of contribution level is not strictly defined"
I would be ok to go ahead without those 2 specified more closely but I'd be
in favor of defining at least a loose metric or some indicators that would
be publicly displayed somewhere so that anyone could come and see for
himself, "this is where most commits come from". Some kind of public
dashboard maybe, similar to the one we have at:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ProjectHealth
but updated in real time with the names of the committers & their number of
commits - if that's doable of course.
WDYT?
Guillaume
Please review it and vote. The idea is then to move it
to
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance in a few days.
As usual, non committers don't have binding votes but are still very much
encouraged to give their opinions. Their voice is especially more important
on this topic since most committers are from XWiki SAS and thus I feel we
need at least a general agreement from the community at large before doing
anything.
Thanks a lot
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/