On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 15:07, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Denis Gervalle
<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:40, Thomas Mortagne
<
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wroteote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Caleb James DeLisle
> <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to switch filesystem attachments to begin using the
persistent
> storage directory now instead of the work
directory.
> > This means there's a new way of calculating where the attachments will
> be stored so it might fail on upgrade.
> > I would like to not do any migration and just add to the release notes
> because:
> > #1, it doesn't cause any permanent harm so long as nobody adds
> attachments while it's in what is an obviously broken state.
> > #2 administrators who have FS attachments enabled are probably going
to
> know what's going on.
> > #3 migration code is scary, it requires lots of work and lots of
review
> and even if it works,
> > people might feel violated having files shuffled around on their
system
without
their permission.
>
> WDYT?
+1 and +1 for no migration by default too. If admin did his job
properly, work dir and permanent dir are supposed to be the same
I do not fully agree. My work dir has always been been stored in a place
like /var/cache, where the data is not backup and has not real importance
(I was not using filesystem attachement obviously). This was the default
on
a debian install. On the other hand,
permanentDirectory should be in
/var/lib, and be backed up. This is my setup right now with the patch of
Caleb.
xwiki.work.dir was already supposed to be used for persisted datas and
there was xwiki.temp.dir for temporary stuff.