On 08/11/2010 06:44 PM, Alex Busenius wrote:
Code names may be a funny addition, but please please
don't completely
replace the normal, universally understandable, mutually comparable
numbers with some random strings that nobody can remember.
+0
+0 for the idea, with the same mention: the code name should be
secondary, leaving the number as the main identifier.
I'd also like something else, not cocktail names.
On 08/11/2010 05:17 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> I would like to propose introducing the use of code names for each release cycle of
XWiki (2.x, 3.x, etc.), using a agreed-on scheme (a la Ubuntu [1]). The main reason behind
this proposal is that :
>
> A. it's groovy :)
> B. there is no B.
>
> As for the code name scheme, with regard to recent events involving a fair portion of
the XWiki Development team [2], I would like to propose the use of cocktail names as code
names. Some examples - for the sake of illustration : XWiki "Cuba Libre" 2.5,
XWiki "White Russian" 2.6, XWiki "Bloody Mary" 3.0, etc. you name it!
[3]. Virgin cocktails tolerated :)
>
> The release manager for each cycle would have the honor to pick up the release code
name. Isn't that an awesome incentive ?
>
> +1 for all that
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/