9 Jul
2015
9 Jul
'15
12:38 p.m.
On 9 Jul 2015 at 12:24:50, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
(gdelhumeau@xwiki.com(mailto:gdelhumeau@xwiki.com)) wrote:
2015-07-09 12:11 GMT+02:00 vincent(a)massol.net :
Indeed, I missed it.
Still the AppBar on the left is also only for some flavors and not for all so it cannot be
a generic solution.
We already have a Navigation Panel (I hope it’s using the new Tree but I don’t recall and
if not then it should) and admins can decide to use it where they want.
We could have it for some flavors where it makes sense, for example for the documentation
flavor but I think we need a more generic solution and sol5/sol6 are better in this
regards.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi Caty,
Thanks for this design page!
On 9 Jul 2015 at 11:55:23, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) (valicac(a)gmail.com
(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
But look at the top menu in this image. On the right, there is a new menu
where you can chose if you want to display the standard app bar or the
tree. It is not very obvious and the fact that you did not even see it
proves that it is not very intuitive. Hi devs,
By default our Tree is localized in AllDocs. This iteration investigates
additional ways to access the current's page position in the hierarchy.
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedTreeLocation
* I don’t like sol2 because depending the usage done for the wiki, you
won’t always want to display a nav panel. So this is an adhoc solution and
not a generic one.
* I don’t like sol3 too much (even though it’s
interesting) because I find
it too hidden away for the users and navigation
is a key feature
* sol1 is not optimal since it requires 2 clicks and you navigate away
from your current page (if you want to cancel the nav it’s not nice). It
could be implemented easily though if we want to have something quickly
while waiting for a better solution
* I like sol6 very much and we should have it but it’s not enough IMO
> * Sol4 and 5 are very nice IMO
>
> So overall my preference goes to Sol4 or 5 (and sol6 done in addition).
>
> Thanks a lot
> -Vincent
>
> > Thanks,
> > Caty