On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Dear XWiki Developers,
In order to better ensure the long term success of the xwiki open source
project, we need to work on making
xwiki.org a place where sponsoring
companies (the main one being XWiki SAS) can thrive and get some revenues
from their contributions to the project (thus allowing them to invest and
even increase their investment in open source).
Actually we've already started this a while ago by defining our governance
process at
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance.
This mail is about going further in this direction and providing more
leverage for sponsoring companies.
Without further ado, here's a list of actions I'm proposing:
A) On the download page, introduce a form (that can be
skipped) to let
user enter their details (name, email) to accept to receive offers, discuss
business projects, and provide onboarding help/tips from companies creating
XWiki. Since XWiki SAS is currently hosting and maintaining
xwiki.org,
I'm proposing that the user details will be sent by mail to some XWiki SAS
email address (i.e. XWiki SAS will be operating user data gathering on
behalf of
xwiki.org, which has no legal entity). On the other side, XWiki
SAS will provide those information to other companies offering a good level
of code contribution to the development of XWiki: I'm proposing the
threshold of 3 active committers to be able to receive those contact
details.
+1
B) Similarly, inside the XWiki product, on the Admin user creation screen
in the Distribution Wizard or elsewhere (place to be defined), have some
checkbox to accept to receive news/onboarding tips/offers from companies
creating XWiki. It'll work the same and send an email to some XWiki
SAS-operated email address. And again XWiki SAS will redistribute the
information to companies having more than 3 active committers on the
project.
+0
C) Add a Support/Offer Panel inside the default XWiki flavor where
companies creating XWiki can advertising their services/offers. In
addition, find a place, maybe in some Admin UI menu for providing the same
information + a configuration option to remove this panel from the UI.
Same as Edy, I prefer having this in the Admin UI rather than in a panel.
D) Allow companies creating XWiki to publish blog entries to present new
offers/services/extensions. We don't want this to turn into spam so the
rule could be no more than 1 such blog entry/mail per month to start with
and those entries need to be presented in a nice community-oriented way.
+1
E) Similarly, allow top sponsoring companies (XWiki SAS at the moment) to
create a monthly newsletter sent to the users list, gathering news about
the xwiki ecosystem in general (product news, events, new
offers/services/paying extensions, tips, etc). There could also be surveys.
XWiki SAS is happy to start this effort and to gather such news from other
sponsoring companies to include them in the newsletter. The idea is to let
the community be more aware of all news that exists be them free or for
pay, and in addition also advertise conferences at which xwiki is
represented, etc.
+1
F) Find a good place in the XWiki runtime (maybe rework the Admin UI home
page to remove the current icons which don't bring any useful information)
to display the
xwiki.org blog. The idea is to provide news from inside
XWiki but not make it intrusive to users (hence the idea of locating it
somewhere in the Admin UI). Of course we need handle the fallback when the
instance is not connected to the internet or behind a proxy.
+0
G) Since XWiki SAS is paying for hosting and maintaining
xwiki.org, the
idea is to mention this on
xwiki.org, possibly in a panel or in the
footer (as we do our other sponsors)
+1
H) Put some company logos of companies using xwiki on the home page or
somewhere visible to advertise more the xwiki software: "hey, look, those
companies are using XWiki”.
+1
I) Increase the visibility for the top sponsoring company. Today we have
an issue is that the company that sponsors the big majority of the source
code is not much more visible than companies which sponsor less than 1% of
the code. Right now we're saying on [[
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance]]: "The
commercial offerings are listed in the order of their contribution levels,
the biggest contributor getting the top spot. In order to keep it simple
the contribution level corresponds to the number of active Committers.".
I'd like to keep the spirit but I believe we need to change the
implementation. Right now all companies are put one under another. This has
the effect of making it more confusing for users to choose and doesn't
reflect the level of contributions of companies. So the new rule I'd like
to have is that on all pages where we list companies, we make the top
contributing company displayed very visibly and have a link for other
companies, leading to another page where they advertise for their services
and offers.
+0
J) Allow sponsoring companies to have paying extensions on
extensions.xwiki.org, under any license (open source or not).
+1
Thanks,
Marius
Here’s my +1
Thanks
-Vincent Massol
Hat 1: CTO XWiki SAS
Hat 2: XWiki Core Committer
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs