3 Oct
2012
3 Oct
'12
8:23 p.m.
On Oct 3, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
I agree with Edy. For me "Future" means
"reviewed and not planned for
any time soon".
The problem is not the meaning; we understand why we introduced it...
Can you explain to me how you've been using it?
If you check current stats you'll see some marked "future" and the vast
majority not scheduled. The reason is that we're not using it and honestly I have no
clue how to use it properly because once you mark one as future what do you do with it?
And since we don't have more visibility than the current release there's no way to
decide further than that if it's planned for the current release then we set the
fixfor for the current release...
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Marius
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I don`t know, for me it`s good to be able to see which issues are in our
> "queue", besides the great sea of not yet processed issues :) I agree that
> we don`t use it much, but I would not go as far as to remove it, so I`m -0.
>
> What happens to issues we discuss/tackle, but don`t manage to
> finish/implement them on time? Do we throw them back into the sea (instead
> of putting them aside for 'Future')?
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> It seems we've never really used the "future' version in jira.
I'd like
>> like to propose to remove it.
>>
>> The idea was that issues that had been reviewed and marked for later were
>> supposed to use "future" but in practice we are not doing it.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent