2009/7/27 [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT Team <
webmaster(a)environmentalchange.net>
Pascal Voitot wrote:
sorry for my last empty mail... clicked too
quick...
I think about Sharepoint for example... this is the first answer you get
when dealing with content management in companies where office networks
already run on Microsoft technos...
I should have a look at it to have some arguments to say this might not
be
the best solution... apparently it can mix
content with structured data
as
XWiki can do with classes/objects... Anyone knows
about it?
Sorry, Pascal, I don't understand what content does mean here. Are not
strutured data content? Won't be better to say something like
"apparently it can mix structured and unstructured data" being
"content"
reserved for the whole "thing"? And I don't understand the comparison
with the use of classes/objects in XWiki.
Yes this is exactly what I mean... you can mix some structured data and
unstructured also...
In my mind, classes/objects in XWiki are the structured data and the
classical Wiki content is the "unstructured" data...
Do you thing to put an example is worth here?
I can't give an example as I don't have sharepoint :)
I am struggling to navigate in the structured data/documents world and
getting the right terminology. After only a few weeks back in an old
path I've abandoned for more than a year, I think that what we are
looking for here is a on-line/off-line Schema-Guided Document-Editing
Interface (Schema being here DTD, XML Schema, or whatever other language
developed to describe XML schemas). To be able to decide if XWiki would
be the framework for such an objective will be of a great help!
Don't understand what you mean with your XML Schemas? Do you want to
represent your structured data with schemas?
Best,
Ricardo
--
Ricardo RodrÃguez
Your EPEC Network ICT Team
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs