On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Ok the vote is passed.
I'm sarting to work on it:
- Execute the tests on XE pages
- Creating discrete jira issues whenever there are problems on
pages, small enough so that they can be tackled one by one
- I'll flag issues with the "wcag" keyword in jira
However for the implementation work (ie fixing the jira issues) I'll
need all devs' help.
I've started documenting our rules (what we've agreed at so far - will
keep adding as we agree on rules) at:
-
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/XhtmlCssCodeStyle -
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Testing
Thanks
-Vincent
> On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Can I get some votes on whether we want to do this or not?
>>
>> So far I've only received a -0 from Marius but on a specific item
>> and not in general.
>>
>> I'd like that we start working on this ASAP by doing the following:
>> - Execute the tests on XE pages
>> - Creating discrete jira issues whenever there are problems on
>> pages, small enough so that they can be tackled one by one
>> - Start fixing the issues
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> We've always tried to follow standards in the XWiki project. I'd
>>> like to propose that we start adhering to the WCAG ones to make
>>> XWiki even more accessible.
>>>
>>> The reason I'm proposing this is because XWiki SAS has been
>>> contacted by some Dutch organization promoting the usage of
>>> standards in Netherlands and they're interested in using XWiki for
>>> their site. As such they need that the wiki they use also follows
>>> the guidelines... They've found XWiki since it was one of the
>>> wikis out there that follows most closely the guidelines.
>>>
>>> This is our opportunity to meet the WCAG guidelines and go even
>>> beyond (since the Dutch guidelines go slightly further I believe,
>>> see
http://www.webrichtlijnen.nl/english/guidelines/). We would be
>>> the first wiki to meet this!
>>>
>>> If we agree we'll need to find some ways to automate the execution
>>> of the verifications. Right now we can test pages using this
>>> validator:
>>>
http://www.webrichtlijnen.nl/english/test/
>>>
>>> I've started verifying this page:
>>>
http://playground.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
>>>
>>> Result:
>>>
http://www.webrichtlijnen.nl/english/test/report/74721/179372/
>>>
>>>
>>> Some examples of failing stuff:
>>>
>>> 1) Style attribute forbidden. Everything from CSS.
>>>
>>> Ex from home page:
>>> <div id="globallinks"> <form
action="/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
>>> WebSearch" style="margin: 0; padding: 0;"> <div
id="globalsearch">
>>> <input id="globalsearchinput" type="text"
name="text"
>>> value="search..." size="15"
class="withTip"/><input class="button"
>>> value="Go" type="image"
src="/xwiki/resources/icons/xwiki/
>>> search.png"/> </div> </form> </div>
>>> ...
>>> <div class="hidden" id="spSpaceCreateForm"><form
action="/xwiki/
>>> bin/view/Main/?xpage=create" method="post"> <div>
<input
>>> name="tocreate" type="hidden"
value="space"></input> <input
>>> class="panelinput" name="title"
onblur="if(this.value=='')
>>> this.value='Space name'" onfocus="if(this.value=='Space
name')
>>> this.value=''" style="margin:auto;"
type="text" value="Space
>>> name"></input> <input type="submit"
value="Create"></input> </div>
>>> </form> </div>
>>> ...
>>> <p style="font-size:0.75em;padding-left:8px;"><a
href="/xwiki/bin/
>>> inline/Panels/QuickLinks">(Edit this panel)</a></p>
>>>
>>> 2) Need to run CSS Level 2.1 validation. Lots of error. For ex on
>>> home page:
http://bit.ly/4x9YlM
>>> 3) Apparently we made a mistake by choosing to have 2 H1 (one for
>>> title and for headers). "The document hierarchy contains more that
>>> one h1 tags .".
>>>
>>> Before going further I'd like to ensure that we all agree to
>>> follow these guidelines and put in our best practices (and ensure
>>> we verify with some automated tests later on).
>>> Here's my +1
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>