Hi all and thanks for your feedbacks.
I fully agree on the fact that having multiple css preprocessors is a good
thing. I didn't want to propose to replace LESS by SASS (except for the
writing of the new skin) and I think we could have both.
The only thing that would not work anymore, is the ability to use the
bootstrap functions in a SSX object using LESS. It's obvious since
Bootstrap is not written with less anymore, but in my opinion, it was the
main strength of our solution. Also, every extension that was using
bootstrap features in a SSX would be broken.
Regarding the tweet that Vincent have posted, I think it shows how
superficial is the consideration for retro-compatibility in the bootstrap's
team.
They haven't switched to Sass because Sass is better or Less is not
sufficient for they needs, but just because they wanted to change!
So now, every projects that want to upgrade have to rewrite everything in
Sass, and the next time, it will be PostCSS!
Since we love creating software for the long-term, it's a very bad point.
Guillaume