Hi Fabio,
This means I am iterating and I gather feedback and depending on that
feedback we must agree on a version.
On a wiki platform, what do you think is more relevant: the user or page
centric approach?
What are the things that make this version (the page centric one) not to fit
the Wiki 3.0 specification?
Jerome missed the avatars, so if you did too, please try to expand the items
in the prototype (when you hover the items an arrow appears in the right
part suggesting that the item can be expanded ).
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 18:05, Fabio Mancinelli
<fabio.mancinelli(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
On 08/30/2010 04:29 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote:
Hi,
This is a page centric proposal for "Recent Changes":
* Partial Prototype (Firefox)
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/ActivityStreamP3D
* Some screenhots
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/ActivityStreamV3
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Caty
P.S: Older user centric proposal was
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/ActivityStreamV2
Does this mean that the user centric proposal is discarded?
I am asking this because when Sergiu sent the mail about the 2.5 Roadmap
the current proposal was user centric (and it fitted perfectly with
Wiki3.0 project's specifications).
-Fabio
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs