Otherwise
you’re forced to have unique names and this is not something
we wish to have.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 02/07/2015 14:08, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
>
>
> On 2 Jul 2015 at 13:49:01, Jean SIMARD
> (jean.simard@xwiki.com(mailto:jean.simard@xwiki.com)) wrote:
>
>> As an end-user, I mainly used LT to *find* elements (usually a
document)
>> and therefore, as a developer, I always
used LT to provide a tool for
>> end-users to access elements. In order for them to find these elements,
>> either you display the data and then the end-user try to find what he's
>> looking for (the way LT works today) or you provide a search engine
>> (these filters we talked about).
>
> So for example how would you imagine
http://extensions.xwiki.org ?
>
> Right now it has a LT that can be used both for navigating to extensions
> and for searching. If you need searching in the content then you use the
> search page.
>
> I find that quite convenient.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> What do you think? LT is more a *find* tool or a *display* tool?
>>
>> On 02/07/2015 11:41, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2 Jul 2015 at 11:37:49, Jean SIMARD
>> > (jean.simard@xwiki.com(mailto:jean.simard@xwiki.com)) wrote:
>> >
>> >> Filters seems a good idea.
>> >>
>> >> For example, I'm pretty sure I've almost never used this
livetable
>> >> without typing something into the search fields of one of the
columns.
>> >> It means that first I'm
filtering, and then I'm browsing. Therefore,
>> >> filtering the tree view first and then browse as a tree would be
pretty
>> >> in line with this workflow. It
indeed means that you don't
display data
>> >> (author and date mainly) but
you filter on them.
>> >
>> > But the main point of LT in general is to display these data! :)
>> >
>> > Ok maybe you were talking about a tree *only* for this page,
while
I’m
>> > talking about LT in general for all
use cases.
>> >
>> > If you don’t display them you loose the rationale and you loose the
>> > ability to decide on what to filter too…
>> >
>> >> But of course, I'm aware that the work on trees may be more
complex,
>> >> more difficult to do. So livetable could be considered as a viable
>> >> temporary solution (let's choose one of the solution that
doesn't imply
>> >> a lot of work in this case
^^).
>> >
>> > I don’t see it as temporary, at least not till someone proposes
>> > something better :)
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Vincent
>> >
>> >> On 02/07/2015 11:17, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2 Jul 2015 at 11:06:42, Jean SIMARD
>> >> > (jean.simard@xwiki.com(mailto:jean.simard@xwiki.com)) wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Nice work.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> However, something stroke me when reading that, why do we
still want
>> >> >> livetable with nested?
The tree seems the best way to represent
>> >> >> hierarchical structure of documents (as you say in sol4) so
I'm not
>> > sure
>> >> >> to understand the real reason to try to keep a livetable and
not
>> >> >> completely drop it and focus on tree view. OK, that is my
opinion.
>> >> >
>> >> > That’s an interesting idea but how do you present data (the other
>> >> > columns) in a tree view, with filters?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> > -Vincent
>> >> >
>> >> >> Now, to talk about your proposition, I guess sol2 or sol3 are
> fine (I
>> >> >> would go more for sol3).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For another solution, maybe you could mixin sol3 with a bit
of sol1.
>> >> >> Let me explain. Use
Sol3 but instead of displaying only parent,
> display
>> >> >> the minify breadcrumb. And fall back to "only
parent" on mobile
> with a
>> >> >> small icon next to it to display the complete path in a popup
or
>> >> >> something similar (or use this icon on every device and
forget about
>> >> >> minify breadcrumb).
Don't know if it makes sense.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hope this helps.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 02/07/2015 00:04, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I've added some ideas on how to display
'Space' column in the
>> >> > AllDocs page:
>> >> >> >
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedLivetable
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let me know what you think and if there are other ideas.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Caty