On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:34, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:17, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 09:25, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> I'm going to work on this and put the code in the xwiki-script module.
>>>
>>> There's only Thomas who voiced his positive opinion on the proposal
below. Could you please let me know if you don't agree (or even if you do, actually).
>>>
>>> Just to complement a bit the proposal here are what some existing mapping
would become (in Velocity for the example):
>>>
>>> * $syntaxFactory --> $services.rendering.syntaxFactory
>>> * $officeimporter --> $services.officeImporter.importer
>>> * $ooconfig --> $services.officeImporter.openOfficeConfiguration
>>> * $oomanager --> $services.officeImporter.openOfficeManager
>>> * $captchaservice --> $services.captcha
>>>
>>> Note 1: It might be good to split xwiki-officeimporter into 2 modules: one
for the importer and one for managing an openoffice server (xwiki-openoffice). In this
case the mapping would be:
>>>
>>> * $officeimporter --> $services.officeImporter
>>> * $ooconfig --> $services.openOffice.configuration
>>> * $oomanager --> $services.openOffice.manager
>>>
>>> Note 2: It might be good to force the format
$services.<modulename>.<object to get>.<method> since otherwise it would
mean putting all the APIs into a single object. I'm not sure on this, we need to
decide.
>>
>> Not sure how it will work, what would be $services.<modulename> ?
>
> For ex for the office importer asiri has a OfficeImporterVelocityBridge (which is the
object that $services.offcieimproter would return)
>
>> I
>> think Velocity stop at the dot and will not try to call
>> $services.get("rendering.syntaxFactory") but
>> $services.get("rendering").get("syntaxFactory") but I'm
not 100% sure
>> about that.
>
> I'm pretty sure it's fine: $services.moduleName.whatever() is equivalent to
$services.get("moduleName").whatever()
I know and that's exactly what is said but that's not what I'm talking
about here, in your proposal you have
$services.module.submodule.whatever()
($services.rendering.syntaxFactory.whatever()) and not
$services.moduleName.whatever() so I'm asking what java object will
represent will be $services.module ? since $services.module.submodule
will be the registered service component.
$services.module.submodule.whatever() is equivalent to
$service.get("module").get("submodule").whatever().
Sure but again that's not what i'm asking: in your proposal what is
$service.get("module")