Hi!
Pascal Voitot wrote:
the wysiwyg should only be a helper allowing to access
some features more
easily but we need to keep the deep customization features (the XWiki
wysiwyg editor is an example of that... you can write with it but when you
need to have a more precise view, you go in the classical editor)
I agree with
that! But I think this was not true with the old XWiki wiki
editor: switching between wiki and WYSIWYG editors results in losses
and/or changes in the format and, as far as I can remember, even
contents (changes in code that result in changes in displayed content).
I guess this is not longer true with the new WYSIWYG included with 2.x.
We are looking for enjoying it.
for sure, this wouldn't be a problem ;)...
Imagine you have a project with a quotation of 1.000.000 mendays... you find
1.000.000 people and in 1 day, you have your solution :)
Wait! We must change a concept here! We can not use man-day. We could
use person-day or people-days! My wife is involved in genre equality
policies and teaches me on this issues.
Greetings!
Ricardo
--
Ricardo RodrÃguez
Your EPEC Network ICT Team