This is not generic - this depends on the containers. We have plenty of
working rules with 100%.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 17:54, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 01/21/2010 04:32 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> First commit! Yeah :) Champagne!
>
> Some questions below (hey I couldn't left the first commit go without
questions ;))
>
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:24 PM, evalica (SVN) wrote:
>
>> Author: evalica
>> Date: 2010-01-21 16:24:22 +0100 (Thu, 21 Jan 2010)
>> New Revision: 26284
>>
>> Modified:
>> platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
>> Log:
>> XSCOLIBRI-180: Scroll and width problems on Stats space
>>
>> Modified:
platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
>>
===================================================================
>> --- platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
2010-01-21 14:52:45 UTC (rev 26283)
>> +++
platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css
2010-01-21
15:24:22 UTC (rev 26284)
>> @@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@
>> }
>>
>> div.panellayoutcontainer-2col .panellayoutcol {
>> - width: 50%;
>> + width: 49%;
>
> Where does this magic number come from? Is the 1% important? If so maybe
this
warrants some comment?
There are rounding errors in IE, sometimes 50% + 50% = 101%
ok thanks. My question was more: shouldn't we comment it?
Or is it more generic and in this case should it be decided as a general
rule and put on
dev.xwiki.org in the best practices section?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs