On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I kind of like this proposal. As Jeremie pointed out, we`re more or less
> > back where we started from, with the "improvement" that the
"Add" button
> is
> > now in the middle of the page, hard to miss :)
> >
> > Now, if we also rename "Add" to "Create", the only downside
is that
> awkward
> > feeling of more or less cloning Atlassian's UI. However, it's never a
> > question of UI ownership or copying, but just of what works best in
> > practice and what makes sense.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Denis asked some days ago why some things changed from the original
> Flamingo proposal "which we all agreed on". Apparently this is the reason
> some of the things changed: listening to different opinions.
>
> One of the reasons I'm a bit upset with these discussions is that when we
> proposed Flamingo, a prototype was also available, so all these 'concerns'
> should have been noticed earlier, not in 6.2.1. These kind of discussions
> should happen in the Proposal phase, not in the Testing phase.
>
I completely agree with you on that point. And this is true for UI, as well
as anything else on this project. We always need it realized to received
criticisms. This probably a consequence of the fact that we are all very
busy. That said, I do not remember seing a proposal that look like the
current result. And your initial proposal does not exhibit the issue we are
actually discussing, which have been mainly started because of the add wiki
option.
Also all the changes proposed in Flamingo, where
discussed before. We used
'Add' naming because 'Create' was less used 'in the wild', was
shorter,
etc. We moved the Add (from the Colibri position) because some users find
it difficult to locate, wanted to improve the actions grouping, etc.
I agree, what I am proposing actually only came from the current discussion
and the evolution of it. It is not always easy to imagine good UI without
tasting it for real. I think we should not care too much, and we should
look forward to finally getting the best UI ever, even if the process is
not academic.
----
I liked the Colibri's 'Add' position and I just want us to make this change
because we think that is the best place for it, not because we are
influenced and think another product might have the magic solution to our
problems.
If you consider that after a 'period of testing' that location is not the
best place for the 'Add' button to be, than I agree we can 'revert' the
change. IMO the menus are still not optimal, but I guess only testing could
give us an impartial answer. I would have liked a bit more time to test
this solution with 'normal' users, and I hope we don't do this change
because regular/advanced users had a hard time to adapt to it. I will
repeat myself, I think skins are allowed to have differences (but maybe
testing different solutions would be more acceptable if we had more skins
or changed them more often).
I do not think we are complaining because we are advance, only because it
mixup "out of context" and "in context" actions. Which is for the end
user,
surely a source of confusion.
Cathy, do not feel too upset of all these changes, you have made a great
job preparing this new skin, it just need polishing as any of what we do. I
know it is frustrating that preview are not look at carefully enough, but
that's life :)
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
>
> >
> > Regarding the addition of yet another "Add" button for page-related
> > entries, as suggested by Denis, I`m not sure it's such a good idea. I
> never
> > did like modals that much in web interfaces and, AFAIK, they are not
> > recommended that much in HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) classes either,
> > for the simple reason that they are too volatile and are not friendly
> with
> > the browser's "Back" button. I think we already have enough
shortcuts in
> > the 'More Actions' section and the 'Edit' dropdown.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> > mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu
wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014
at 11:04 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
> > > > gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Even better:
> > > >>
>
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/19c9c68f-9dae-440e-ad82-3b8a6cc4623a.jpg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes that one looks very cool to me but... :)
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if the name would not be better to be "Create".
> > > >
> > > > Since, I think we still need an another button in the page called
> "Add"
> > > to
> > > > add to the page:
> > > > * annotations using modal (you may select, than use the button
> > normally)
> > > > * comment using a modal (without having to scroll to the bottom)
> > > > * attachement using a modal (without having to scroll to the
> bottom),
> > > > * objects using a modal (without necessarily needing to load all
> > > existing
> > > > objects for edit, so a page could show objects without having to
> manage
> > > > addition of new ones, AWSeconds)
> > > >
> > >
> > > > This way, the extradoc tabs could be hidden, independently of the
> > > > comment/attachment functionality, and the pain of scrolling to the
> > bottom
> > > > is removed.
> > >
> > > Adding a comment or uploading a file using a modal box is fine.
> > > Viewing the comments/attachments in a modal box is not a good idea
> > > IMO. The user expects to see the comments/attachments after the
> > > content. I don't think we can hide the extradoc tabs. Or maybe I
> > > misunderstood.
> > >
> > > > It give also some logic to those button, with a non-contextual
> > > > create button, and a contextual add button. We could then allow
> > > application
> > > > to hook both of them depending on their needs.
> > > >
> > > > Another, a bit off-topic, remarks, is that in the More actions,
> > > annotation
> > > > should be isolated, and work like a toggle to display/hide them
> > > (including
> > > > the author filter box and the tooltips), without needing to click a
> > > > seperate checkbox.
> > > >
> > > > WDYT ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> 2014-10-01 10:59 GMT+02:00 Guillaume "Louis-Marie"
Delhumeau <
> > > >> gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
> > > >>
> > > >> > So basically, you want:
> > > >> >
> >
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/25ad0704-563e-41cd-bbf2-72c371912245.jpg
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2014-10-01 10:46 GMT+02:00 vincent(a)massol.net
<vincent(a)massol.net
> >:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 1 Oct 2014 at 10:09:00, Guillaume Lerouge (
> guillaume(a)xwiki.com
> > > >> (mailto:
> > > >> >> guillaume(a)xwiki.com)) wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Hi,
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > after discussing with Vincent this morning we came
to a
> > suggestion
> > > >> that
> > > >> >> > would fix my issue with the current location of the
add button.
> > The
> > > >> idea
> > > >> >> > would be to move the search bar to the left of the
menu, and
> put
> > > the
> > > >> >> "Add"
> > > >> >> > button in its place.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Crude image explanation here:
> > > >> >> >
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hrxlj6n6pztigic/AddButton-Search.png
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > This way the "Add" button is back in a
global menu, not in a
> menu
> > > that
> > > >> >> is
> > > >> >> > contextual to the page, yet it stays very visible.
In addition
> to
> > > >> this,
> > > >> >> > since "Create wiki" is visible only to
authorized users, it's
> not
> > > too
> > > >> >> much
> > > >> >> > in the way. Last item: this solves the issue of
having the
> "Edit"
> > > and
> > > >> >> "More
> > > >> >> > actions" buttons separated from one another.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > WDYT?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Sounds the best to me! :) I never really liked the move
of the
> > Create
> > > >> >> button in the page contextual menu (doesn’t make sense to
me).
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> FYI here’s what they have for:
> > > >> >> - confluence:
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s119/sh/948c4f24-2485-4b33-8452-1e6e1a2d6c74…
> > > >> >> - jira:
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s119/sh/b8803c9b-4ea7-43dd-a2ed-1226080074f2…
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Thanks
> > > >> >> -Vincent
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Guillaume
> > > >> >> > ᐧ
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Eduard Moraru
wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Guillaume
Lerouge
> > > >> >> >
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > > Hi,
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Ecaterina
Moraru (Valica)
> <
> > > >> >> > > > valicac(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> >
> > > >> >> > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:24 PM,
Guillaume Lerouge <
> > > >> >> > > > > me(a)guillaumelerouge.com>
> > > >> >> > > >
wrote:
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > Hi,
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM,
Ecaterina Moraru
> > (Valica)
> > > <
> > > >> >> > > > > > valicac(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at
3:48 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <
> > > >> >> > > > > guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
> > > >> >> > > > > >
wrote:
> > > >> >> > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > Hi Marius,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014
at 3:54 PM, Marius Dumitru
> > Florea
> > > <
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> > >
>> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 25,
2014 at 1:58 PM, Guillaume
> Lerouge
> > <
> > > >> >> > > > > > > guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > > > > > > Hi again,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep
25, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Guillaume
> > > >> >> "Louis-Marie"
> > > >> >> > > > > > Delhumeau <
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Hi
Eddy,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
2014-09-25 11:59 GMT+02:00 Eduard Moraru <
> > > >> >> > > > enygma2002(a)gmail.com
> > > >> >> > > > > >:
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > Hi
devs,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > I`m
not sure if we already have a discussion
> > > >> started
> > > >> >> on
> > > >> >> > > this
> > > >> >> > > > > > > topic,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > but
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> in
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > my
opinion, it's long overdue. I see people
> > > start
> > > >> >> being
> > > >> >> > > > > confused
> > > >> >> > > > > > > and
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
questions like this [1] start to be asked.
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > The
new location of the Add menu in Flamingo
> > is
> > > >> >> > > problematic
> > > >> >> > > > > IMO
> > > >> >> > > > > > > for
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > a
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
various number of reasons:
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -
It falsely gives the impression that it
> adds
> > > >> >> > > page-related
> > > >> >> > > > > > > entries
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > (i.e.
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
related to the current page), due to its
> > current
> > > >> >> location
> > > >> >> > > > > (i.e.
> > > >> >> > > > > > in
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > the
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> page
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
content)
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -
It conflicts with AWM`s "Add new Entry"
> > button
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > More
generally speaking, this is true for a lot
> > of
> > > >> >> > > livetables.
> > > >> >> > > > We
> > > >> >> > > > > > > would
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > need a
generic "Create" button to be available
> > > when we
> > > >> >> > > > > instantiate
> > > >> >> > > > > > a
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > livetable.
This could be useful for the wiki
> > index
> > > >> >> page, for
> > > >> >> > > > the
> > > >> >> > > > > > user
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > directory,
for all the AWM homepages...
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > I guess you like
the files live table from the
> File
> > > >> >> Manager
> > > >> >> > > then
> > > >> >> > > > :)
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/File+Manager+Applicati…
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > . Would be
interesting to have such a toolbar
> (with
> > > >> >> support for
> > > >> >> > > > > > custom
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > buttons) before
the live table don't you think?
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > IMO the toolbar's
functionality is already covered by
> > the
> > > >> >> > > 'Actions'
> > > >> >> > > > > > column
> > > >> >> > > > > > > in the livetable. The only
thing missing is the
> > 'Create'
> > > >> >> > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > I'm not sure this is the
same use case. I can see at
> > least
> > > 3
> > > >> >> reasons
> > > >> >> > > > why:
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > IMO it's exactly the same use
case, the only difference
> is
> > > that
> > > >> >> the
> > > >> >> > > > Actions
> > > >> >> > > > > column was used as an intermediate
solution because we
> > didn't
> > > >> had
> > > >> >> bulk
> > > >> >> > > > > actions in livetable (the ability to
make multiple entity
> > > >> >> selection
> > > >> >> > > > > (checkbox) - that's why we
duplicate the entries on each
> > > row).
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > > Great, this means that we agree on the
fact that the
> > "Actions"
> > > >> >> column
> > > >> >> > > > should be replaced by a "Select"
column with checkboxes in
> > it,
> > > and
> > > >> >> also
> > > >> >> > > > that Marius' horizontal livetable
toolbar should be
> expanded
> > > to be
> > > >> >> used
> > > >> >> > > in
> > > >> >> > > > a generic fashion by all livetables :-)
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > Not completely replaced because not all
operations/actions
> can
> > be
> > > >> >> performed
> > > >> >> > > in bulk fashion. Take the 'edit' action
and notice that it
> is a
> > > >> single
> > > >> >> > > element action compared to 'delete'.
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > A different situation exists for the
'rename' action since it
> > is
> > > >> more
> > > >> >> of a
> > > >> >> > > single element action, but can be presented as
a bulk action
> as
> > > well
> > > >> >> if you
> > > >> >> > > provide some kind of renaming template like
'_'.
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > In other words, both the bulk operations
toolbar and the
> > actions
> > > >> >> column
> > > >> >> > > have their right place in the livetable IMO and
having a
> > checkbox
> > > >> >> column
> > > >> >> > > like Marius did for the FM livetable looks like
the right way
> > to
> > > go.
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> >> > > Eduard
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > > Guillaume
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > Thanks,
> > > >> >> > > > > Caty
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > 1/ The "create" button
would generate a new entry,
> > whereas
> > > the
> > > >> >> > > > "actions"
> > > >> >> > > > > > column is for actions that are
related to individual
> > > entries
> > > >> >> that
> > > >> >> > > > already
> > > >> >> > > > > > exist
> > > >> >> > > > > > 2/ The "actions"
column can be removed by the livetable
> > > >> creator
> > > >> >> > > > > > 3/ The toolbar would also be
useful to handle bulk
> > actions
> > > on
> > > >> >> pages
> > > >> >> > > > such
> > > >> >> > > > > as
> > > >> >> > > > > > "delete selected
entries" (as in the file manager)
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > Best,
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > Guillaume
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > Caty
> > > >> >> > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > Yes and yes :-)
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > Guillaume
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Basically
the button would let the user create
> a
> > > new
> > > >> >> item of
> > > >> >> > > > the
> > > >> >> > > > > > same
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > type
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > than the
items displayed in the livetable.
> Right
> > > now
> > > >> we
> > > >> >> do
> > > >> >> > > this
> > > >> >> > > > > in
> > > >> >> > > > > > an
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > ad-hoc
fashion, so it would be great to have a
> > > generic
> > > >> >> > > > solution.
> > > >> >> > > > > > It's
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > also
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > related to
the automatic page name generation
> > > module
> > > >> >> (that we
> > > >> >> > > > > don't
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > have
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > in
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > the core
yet, though there's an extensions
> doing
> > it
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Unique+Identification+…
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > ).
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Guillaume
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -
from my POV, looking at the page from a
> far,
> > > the
> > > >> >> new
> > > >> >> > > > > location
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > looks
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
completely randomly selected:
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > --
It's not on the left/top (as
> left-to-right
> > > >> >> language
> > > >> >> > > > > specific
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > brains
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> are
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
trained to follow)
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > --
it's not exactly at the top either
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > --
it's not at the right
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > --
it's not next to the type of elements it
> > > creates
> > > >> >> (i.e.
> > > >> >> > > > next
> > > >> >> > > > > > to
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
WIKI/SPACE/PAGE)
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > --
it basically is almost in the middle of
> the
> > > >> screen
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -
etc. (i.e. others that don`t come right
> now
> > > to my
> > > >> >> mind)
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
Personally, I like the fact that it is located
> > > near
> > > >> >> the Edit
> > > >> >> > > > > > button,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > even
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> if it
does not concern the current page.
> Because
> > > it
> > > >> >> groups
> > > >> >> > > the
> > > >> >> > > > > > most
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > basic
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> and
useful actions that you need when you want
> > to
> > > >> >> > > contribute:
> > > >> >> > > > > > EDIT,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > ADD.
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> To me,
it makes sense.
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > I`d
like to open a discussion on this, since
> > > it's
> > > >> >> quite an
> > > >> >> > > > > > > important
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> aspect
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > of
the UI and, due to it's shiny green color
> > > (which
> > > >> >> I like
> > > >> >> > > > > :)),
> > > >> >> > > > > > > it`s
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > hard
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > to
miss.
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > Is
it just me who's resistant to change, or
> do
> > > >> >> others see
> > > >> >> > > a
> > > >> >> > > > > > > problem
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > here
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
with this as well?
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
Thanks,
> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
Eduard
> > > >> >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> >> devs mailing list
> > > >> >> devs(a)xwiki.org
> > > >> >>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
> > > >> > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > > >> > Committer on the
XWiki.org project
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
> > > >> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > > >> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> devs mailing list
> > > >> devs(a)xwiki.org
> > > >>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Denis Gervalle
> > > > SOFTEC sa - CEO
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > devs mailing list
> > > > devs(a)xwiki.org
> > > >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devs mailing list
> > > devs(a)xwiki.org
> > >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > devs(a)xwiki.org
> >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO