2 Sep
2015
2 Sep
'15
2:19 p.m.
Notes:
* I still think that some variation of sol4 (to make it not too crowded) would be the
best, not just for the navigation but also to have common actions be readily accessible
for any level (watch, etc). But this could be tuned in the future and having at least sol5
now is good IMO.
* However, I think that Sol 6 is a must too and we could offer commons actions there too
(currently we have view and edit). It’s not incompatible at all with sol5, so we shouldn’t
choose sol5 vs sol6. So I’m big +1 to have sol6 in addition to sol5. In term of priority,
sol5 is more important.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 2 Sep 2015 at 14:06:25, Marius Dumitru Florea (mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com) wrote:
+1 for Sol5
Thanks,
Marius
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Some summary of the expressed opinions:
Sol1: -0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty)
Sol2: -0 (GD), -1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty)
Sol3: +0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty)
Sol4: -1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), -1 (Caty)
Sol5: +1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), +1 (Gabi), +0 (Caty), +1 (Eduard)
Sol6: +0 (GD), +0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty)
So currently the proposal that have the most positive feedback are: Sol5
and Sol6.
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 for 5 for reasons already mentioned and
because I find it to be the most
natural.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Gabriela Smeria <gabriela.smeria(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for your effort, Caty!
> - Solution1: I think in order to see
the tree, there are required a
> minimum number of clicks and this solution clearly doesn’t cover this
> condition
> - Solution2: it seems a bit hidden, IMO and also too many clicks, as
> Sol1
> - Solution3: is a very good idea, but is not sufficient and also a bit
> hidden
> - Solution4: is too crowded, IMO a breadcrumb should be as simpler as
it
> As a conclusion, my choice will be a
combination between 3 and 5, or 5
and
> 6.
> Thanks,
> Gabriela
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
can be
- Solution5: this is the best solution from my point of view, because
it
> also preserves the old breadcrumb and it adds a new element, with a
> “home”
> icon which I think is intuitive enough
> - Solution6: same as Sol3 - really nice to have, but not sufficient