5 Nov
2009
5 Nov
'09
9:31 a.m.
Can I make a sugestion to symplify the fields ?
Just removing semantic indications that are not mandatory
We need some kind of consistency - we can't just remove some indications and
leave others. The big problem is that the importance of the fields can be
subjective from one person to another.
-- John Martins --
(remove name from list since it is already at the top ?)
It's at the top because there is a way to enter that information in the
profile's form. I wanted to keep the position of the fields the same in view
mode and edit mode. So if we make some fields disappear in one view, this
can lead to some confusion.
(maybe put the username a little stronger than
usersurname to make sur it
differentiate for foreign names ?)
I don't think we need to more differentiate some fields from the others.
They are already in categories. The field's name are descriptive enough not
to produce confusions.
Description :
(first, as a personalized, more "eye
contact" part ?)
Hello, I'm an IT engineer !
I'm found of XWiki !
Departement : Technology
Office : XWiki Nantes (new office ^_^)
Contact :
John(a)xwiki.com
+ 33 (0)6 32 49 34 23
Site :
http://www.xwiki.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In modify mode, maybe put the aditional semantic needed in grey in the
field
?
I'm not sure I understand what are "aditional semantic" . You mean the
field's name?
Proposal 2
I prefer to keep the photo near the name. More coherent in semantic. (so
people ++ make link with name and face)
I know that it may be not evident with the list. Because of blank space ?
Tabs Vs List : Tabs is theorically more structuring and immediatly seen,
yet, yes, I like the list more. It lightweight the structure.
>> Does
he have the ability to control the resize and the centering?
Not for a first version I agree (unless we use a
library that does
it). However for the future it's a UX thing.
I agree to say it is an UX thing because users may hate to have a bad
cropping of them photo.
I think it become good UX only when transparent in most of cases (default
crop proposal being ok on most standard photos + just upload - show the
photo (can re-crop if needed) - validate).