+1 if you lead the effort to making this implementation the default in the future.
I'd like to know what are the next steps though and their timeframe.
Denis, do you plan to refactor some existing code to use this new API? IMO this would be
the best next step to prove that it works. Fo you have any idea about what code could be
migrated?
We need to be careful not to keep this new security module not used for too long as
otherwise it could "rot". So IMO we need to start using it ASAP and then have a
plan for switching to it.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Feb 15, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
Hi all,
As you have probably notice, I have recently committed an
feature-security-authorization branch on platform. I am working on this for
a while now and it was the first step to share the outcome of this large
refactoring of the initial work done early last year by Andreas. Since the
code was not quality compliant with platform but the general structure
Andreas has build seems to me well appropriate, I have progressively
refactor its code to better fit our real needs. Here is what I have been
done:
1) Split in to module api and bridge to allow breaking the currently
unavoidable dependency on oldcore. Now only bridge depends on oldcore, and
the api does not depends on bridge. As mush as possible has been written in
the api (still some code to migrate), and some temporary internal bridge
are used to access oldcore stuffs since augmenting the existing
document-bridge does not seems appropriate IMO.
2) The initial enumeration of rights as been replaced by a Right class,
which could be seen has a pseudo enum, but could be augmented with new
rights. To register a new Right, you have to provide a RightDescription to
the AuthorizationManager. The description will define the default state,
the tie resolution policy, the inheritance policy, the list of entity types
for which the right is applicable, the implied rights and if the right
could be allowed in read-only mode. So new defined Right will benefit the
whole logic of the AuthorizationManager and currently existing one could be
declaratively defined.
3) Large renaming to better distinguish stuffs, clarify comments and
prepare for future. I have voluntarily not taken existing names to clearly
split the old and the new api. In brief, the new right service is now named
AuthorizationManager. Internally, it manipulates SecurityReference (as well
as UserSecurityReference and GroupSecurityReference, to represent entities,
user and group), SecurityRule (representing a right object) and
SecurityAccess (representing an access level in the old nomenclature),
which are store in a SecurityCache using SecurityRuleEntry (a set of rules)
and SecurityAccessEntry (the access of a given user). The
AuthorizationManager delegate cache management to a SecurityCacheLoader
which loads rules using a SecurityRuleLoader ; and delegate itself the
computing of the access for a given user and a set of rules to an
AuthorizationSettler. This last one could be overridden to provide specific
decision that could not be done in declarative mode.
4) Refactoring was necessary to improve consistency and reduce complexity,
and simplify as much as possible; while extending the limitations to allow
more rights to be registered. This work has been a little bit opposed to
the optimization done by Andreas, in particular on memory usage. But
optimization is often the enemy of clean code.
5) Improvement were necessary to better mimic the existing implementation
in some peculiar but necessary rules to stay compatible with current
working wiki. I tend to reduce as much as possible what is not done
declaratively, but there are still some special cases, like delete for
creators, deny for other user on explicit allow and admin for wiki owner
that are settle by the authorization settler. My implementation should be
almost compatible with the old one, except for groups that are currently
not checked from the entity wiki, but only from the user wiki. This needs
some more refactoring for which I feel inconfortable with, some I'd like to
share first.
6) The AuthorizationManager interface has been simplified, providing 2
methods for either checking or verifying an access right (the checking
methods throws while the verifying one return a boolean), and one to
register a new right.
The existing RightService could be bridged on the new implementation using
the XWikiCachingRightService class in xwiki.cfg and the new API could be
used side-by-side with the old implementation as well. What should still
really need to be improved is the unit testing, currently some tests are
still awful and incomplete. I already refactor some of them, to provide a
better coverage of essential part of the code: the security cache and the
default authorization settler. Obviously, any help is welcomed.
Since I already have an existing wiki using this implementation
successfully and using it for creating new rights for extensions, I would
like to merge this new implementation as experimental in platform to have
it available for anyone who need it or want to test it, and for you to use
in your new experimental development as well. Providing it in platform will
encourage it to be finalized and replace the existing implementation.
Here is my +1 for the merge on 4.x,
WDYT ?