25 Mar
2011
25 Mar
'11
10:54 a.m.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:50, Paul Libbrecht <paul(a)hoplahup.net> wrote:
Le 25 mars 2011 à 10:39, Vincent Massol a écrit :
Hence the +0.
Was it Curriki, I had bragged.
As i said there is first:
"Plus I prefer having a build certified working on 3.0 than 2.2 and I
don't want to build everything twice with both maven versions on our
ci build just for that." (with some corrections ;))
Also same argument as Vincent: maven 3 has better performance and is
the last one and i don't see why we would use an older one
Honestly,
I have a hard time to keep up with the maven versions...
I was somewhat more active at maven 1 and now maven 3 would be imposed me...
Well this is only if you need to build xwiki from sources and honestly installing maven
is so easy (takes exactly 1 minute last time I timed it!) that I can't see this as a
real blocker :) Note that maven3 is much better than the 2 and a
lot faster so you'll benefit ;)
Thanks for your feedback though.
I feel there's a use in staying at classics such as older maven or older ant.
Everyone knows them and you don't have to relearn.
But I am sure Thomas had arguments in favor of Maven3... he did not mention them.
paul
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne