Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] ASM 3.x vs 4.x choice

Hi devs, We have a problem ATM since we bundle both ASM 3.1 and 4.0 at the same time in XWiki. See http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XE-1269 We have to take some decisions: 1) We say that we don't support indexing .class files in attachments at the moment (we open a jira for it so that we don't forget to fix it later on) and we open an issue on the tika parser tracker to migrate to ASM 4.X. We follow that issue and when they add support for it we upgrade to it. 2) I put back pegdown 1.0.2 (we're on 1.2.1) but that means changing code and removing features since they have implemented new features since 1.0.2 (they have released 3 versions since then). I don't like this. 3) We modify Tika parser sources so that it works with ASM 4.0 and we publish in our maven repo. It's like 1) but we do the work. Personally I think that 3) is too much work for the benefits so I would go for 1). WDYT? Any other idea? I'm voting 1 (i.e. ASM 4.0) Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs