23 Aug
2016
23 Aug
'16
12:28 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Paul Libbrecht
<paul(a)hoplahup.net> wrote:
So what needs to be done here is a
converter which is a lot bigger than
a packager.
Which is what I indicated: you just use XFF filter (which already
exist) in input and XAR filter (which also already exist) as output.
> We'll see what Jean says.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, do I understand at least that an enrichment to the
> xar-mojo is a more conservative approach that might have a better chance
> of uptake?
What I
obtain after mvn package is a file my-application.xff.
> I can't seem to import that. Should I be able to?
Not trough XAR tools
no, it's completely different format. > What does it take for me to get the patch
accepted?
It takes the following IMO:
* it works
* it does not break any retro compatibility (probably not enabled by
default for example)
Now Guillaume has a point. The issue you will quickly have as soon as
you start using this is that you HAVE to modify your XAR trough
filesystem because you can't edit it in XWiki and export it anymore.
That is if you don't provide any tool to export this kind of XAR
extension.
thanks
Paul
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne