On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
Right now JavaScript extensions are included when a document is rendered
in WYSIWYG edit mode. This has both advantages and disadvantages.
Pro: If the output of a macro depends on a JavaScript extension, then
the result of rendering that macro will be the same in view mode and
(WYSIWYG) edit mode.
Con: If the JavaScript extension is not aware of the edit mode then it
can modify the DOM document outside of the read-only macro markers which
leads to unwanted changes in the content of the edited document (i.e.
the modifications done by the JavaScript extension are saved). Such an
example is
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4665 .
Would XSKINX-14 (Let extensions declare a list of web actions (view, edit,
etc.) it should be pulled for) fix at least some of the issues?
WDYT? Should we limit the WYSIWYG in order to make the
editing safer?
I'm +0.
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs