Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal][UX] Notifications Improvements 9.8+

On 30 Oct 2017, at 12:27, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>

There is only 1 icon if the action is done by the "Pages" app, coming

XWiki. I've considered that this is the main/default app, so we don't display

It's the default. So if you have created, edited, delete, commented on a normal page, you

just the event action. If the page is special, coming from a particular application, then you

an additional icon, marking the application.

For me we always need 2 icons: > * one to represent the application (e.g. Pages app, Blog app, etc) > * one to represent the event (e.g. for the Paged app: Create, Modify, > Delete, Comment. For the Blog app: Publish a blog post) > > So if we display the avatar this means 3 icons: one for the avatar, one > for the app and one for the event. Maybe that’s a bit too much. > > Right now, on the proposals I see, I find it very confusing and I can > never figure out which is the app and which is the event. > > I think I would prefer the following: > * On the left, avatar in big + app in smaller on top of it > * On the right, icon for the event. Actually the icon could be in

> to the “text” (i.e. “edited by”, “published by”, “commented by”,

> by”, etc) or we could drop the icon for the event and only keep the

I wouldn't drop the event icon since that's the most important piece of information now.

The grouping is done by page and by event. You want to know if someone deleted a new entry or just edited in a rapid way, without the need to read the text.

I have put all the icons on the left in order to be easier to scan for

in collapsed and expanded form. Having the icons on the right made the layout very centered-heavy + you didn't had the extremities in order to scan for them. So Guillaume and Clement like the event-focused view. I don't particularly like the big event icons. I find them more cold and less personal. So I prefer the users-centered version.

I like: http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/

Now I haven't created versions for all the combinations, but we should decide if: - we want user focused vs. event focused layout - expanded version should have users or events on the left; - the summary should contain avatars or not for the users (important when there is a single user that did the event); - if / when we combine the users (when we have more than 2/3 users;

I am lacking some information in order to get some statistical decisions. For example, in practice: - we have more individual events or more events done by multiple people? - how common is to group also events? the example with blog published

also has the create. Do we really need to display them? Also when

an user profile we launch a multitude of edit events, should all those be displayed? Regarding the user vs. event focused layout: it's just in the layout and what we display on the first position, since I've kept the current page/event grouping that is currently implemented. The decision depends

how everyone is using the wiki: are they more interested in activity

done on the wiki or who actually did that activity?

I like to see who did what, but if the Notifications implementation will always group users and we will get the Group icon, than this might not be very nice. Thanks, Caty > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> So these are some more iterations for the notifications layout >> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/ > NotificationsImprovements9xTypes >> >> I've played with User centered vs. Event centered and variants for >> displaying the avatars, user names and event names. >> >> Let me know what version you prefer. Also you can fork the prototypes

>> you want to make some small changes. >> >> Thanks, >> Caty >> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt; > wrote: >> >>> >>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 11:24, Guillaume Delhumeau < >>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> 2017-10-24 11:12 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt;et>: >>>> >>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>> >>>>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 10:58, Guillaume Delhumeau < >>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Any news on this? I'd like to implement this quickly because 9.10

>>>>> coming >>>>>> :) >>>>> >>>>> This the current status: >>>>> * Caty proposed some improved layout for displaying notifications >>>>> * I commented about the need to display event + type, and about the > need >>>>> to have a link to see the diff. I also mentioned that we need to

> on >>>>> the mail template display >>>>> * Caty replied and updated her proposal to take into account those >>>>> comments. >>>>> * I kind of like Caty’s proposal focused on the user. We want to

>>>>> contributions and I think it helps. It also makes the UI more > appealing >>>>> visually. >>>>> * You mentioned that you’d prefer a proposal more focused on the

>>>>> rather than the user >>>>> * Thomas agrees with you >>>>> * Edy mentioned some extra points >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have also mentioned that the diff we propose is too technical for > many >>>> users. >>> >>> Yes and we have 4 solutions: >>> >>> * Solution 1: make it simpler to understand for everyone >>> * Solution 2: have a wiki admin UI level option to select whether to >>> include diff or not in the default template + user-level profile UI > option >>> (ie. per user) >>> * Solution 3: have a singe button in the mail, that, when clicked, >>> displays the diff (which is hidden by default) >>> * Solution 4: implement 2 mail templates (one for simple users and one > for >>> advanced users) and let the users choose in their profile which one

>>> want to receive + have a wiki admin UI level option to decide which is > the >>> default when not overridden by the user. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>>> >>>>> So I guess we need to decide about whether we show the avatar as in >>> Caty’s >>>>> proposal or not, right? Is that what you’re asking about Guillaume? >>>>> >>>>> On my side, I don’t see the issue in displaying the user avatar

> vs >>>>> small. The events are still ordered by page events. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Vincent >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-10-23 13:19 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Delhumeau < >>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt;gt;: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Note that you have a mail template for the notifications too. It's >>>>>>> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/ >>>>>>> 83b76ed4c26954aa2755bbdce23b32c41725ac06/xwiki-platform- >>>>>>> core/xwiki-platform-notifications/xwiki-platform- >>>>>>> notifications-ui/src/main/resources/XWiki/Notifications/ >>>>>>> MailTemplate.xml#L23 but it's not documented yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This mail template allows you to customize the header and the

>>> of >>>>>>> the email, but not the actual content. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To be precise, each *event type* can have its own template or > failback >>>>> to >>>>>>> the default one (https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/ >>>>>>> acdf68f4c0d20a9b44ea48eec4df808e22c54548/xwiki-platform- >>>>>>> core/xwiki-platform-web/src/main/webapp/templates/ >>>>>>> notification/email/default.html.vm) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So it's a template *per event type* and it's not linked to any

>>>>>>> choice. But we could add some options in the default template for >>>>> example. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-10-17 16:23 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt;et>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2017, at 07:16, Guillaume Delhumeau < >>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some ideas. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have feedback about the fact the diff is way too technical for >>>>> users. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Example: "What does it means???" https://img15.hostingpics.net/ >>>>>>>>> pics/670307example1.png >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So we could hide this in a "technical details" link. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That’s one option but there’s another which is to provide the > ability >>>>> to >>>>>>>> choose which mail template to use in the Admin and provide

>>>>>>>> templates for different needs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For example for the xwiki.org watchlist we absolutely need to be >>> able >>>>> to >>>>>>>> see the diffs without clicking a “technical details” link for

>>>>>>>> notification. It could be ok if there’s a single “technical > details” >>>>> link >>>>>>>> for ALL notifications that shows all diffs at once. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The "details" link could be replaced by a "more" link, with a

>>>>>>>>> simplified diff (the complete diff would go the the technical >>> details >>>>>>>> view). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the body of the event, in addition with the title of the >>> document, >>>>> we >>>>>>>>> could add some extracts of the diff. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Example taken on gmail: >>>>>>>>> https://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/763456example2.png >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I hope it helps, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2017-10-12 15:38 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol &lt;vincent(a)massol.net&gt;et>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looks nice. Does it work in all mail clients that support HTML? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd like an option to show the details for all events as > otherwise >>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>> too painful to have to open all one by one (for the use case

>>> you >>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>> to check everything). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Same as Guillaume: not all events are page-related events. So

>>> need >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> handle those too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 12 Oct 2017, at 15:03, Guillaume Delhumeau < >>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> First of all, it looks very nice. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now, you said the events are displayed like in the > notifications, >>>>> but >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> the notifications they are ordered by dates, not by pages.

>>> your >>>>>>>>>>> proposal imply to change the ordering? What about events that

>>> not >>>>>>>>>>> concern any page (like: "a new wiki has been created" or "a

>>>>> XWiki >>>>>>>>>>> version is available")? We don't have such events for now but

>>>>> plan >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> have some soon. We could display them last for example. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nice CSS expand! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks you, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-12 14:47 GMT+02:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < >>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is a proposal for the Notifications mail: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/ >>>>>>>>>>>> NotificationsImprovements9xEmail >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've continued with the 'user' avatar focused proposal, since >>> I've >>>>>>>>>>>> currently focused on the email template. If we drop the user >>> avatar >>>>>>>>>> (since >>>>>>>>>>>> we group multiple users) then we can have the event/app icon >>>>> instead >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> avatar. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What I want to have feedback on is the email layout, >>> functionality >>>>>>>> (tree >>>>>>>>>>>> navigation, details expanding) and styling. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can play with the Prototype >>>>>>>>>>>> http://jsfiddle.net/risherry/cj25759w/embedded/#Result >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If we were to translate to the mail template, there are still >>> some >>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>> to be tested (like translating the CSS selectors into inline, >>>>> decide >>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>> email clients we support, etc.) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know, >>>>>>>>>>>> Caty >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau < >>>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 17:32 GMT+02:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < >>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Guillaume Delhumeau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-02 18:09 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol < > vincent(a)massol.net >>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2017, at 18:08, Vincent Massol < > vincent(a)massol.net >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2017, at 18:05, Vincent Massol < >>> vincent(a)massol.net&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another feedback/questions: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Is the avatar icon clickable and leading to the user >>>>> profile? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * We need a way to link directly to the diff, at least > for >>>>> page >>>>>>>>>>>>>> events >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that the user can see what was modified (as we have >>>>> currently >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AS) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Maybe “2 hours ago” is not precise enough. In your >>> example I >>>>>>>>>>>> see >>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created and modified the Roadmap page but they both say

>>>>> hours >>>>>>>>>>>>> ago”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn’t I be able to see how far away both events were >>> done? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My understanding is that events are grouped by app+type

>>> not >>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> entity >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anymore (for page events) and thus you can have 3 events >>>>>>>> displayed >>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same page, f.ex: Creation, Modification, Deletion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you could also have different users grouped in the

>>>>>>>> composite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event. So when you display the details, it would be nice

>>> show >>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made each event, and I see you have removed this info. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The focus of this proposal is on user, compared to the old > one, >>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the app/doc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Close to what we have on Facebool. So it didn't made sense > that >>>>> we >>>>>>>> say >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a page has been edited by vmassol, and that the details >>> showcase >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple user actually did the edit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In Facebook, you have it actually: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pasteboard.co/GOioRAT.png >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On XWiki, we have the following (already implemented): >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pasteboard.co/GOiqgYf.png >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2017, at 18:01, Vincent Massol < >>> vincent(a)massol.net >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:54, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Event Type: BlogPostPublishedEvent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NotificationsImprovements9x#HEventTypes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok thanks, had missed this since I was reading from

> to >>>>>>>>>>>> bottom >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stopped at the overview :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I don’t think it scales since it means one > unique >>>>> icon >>>>>>>>>>>>> per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> combination of app type + event type. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would scale better is two icons: one for the app > type >>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the event type. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example imagine that the Blog app had the

>>>>>>>> events: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * When a blog post is published >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * When a blog post is created >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * When a blog post is removed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn’t be able to use the RSS icon to represent > the >>> 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> events. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW the RSS icon isn’t necessarily representative of

>>>>> Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>> app. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of apps can have a RSS feed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s the main remark I have: it’s going to be harder > and >>>>>>>>>>>> harder >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find unique icons as we had more events to apps,

>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>> there’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 icon that is supposed to combine both app type + event >>> type. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Vincent Massol < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vincent(a)massol.net&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Caty, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:21, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've created some improvements suggestions for our >>>>>>>>>>>>> Notifications >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UI, see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NotificationsImprovements9x >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Re the overview, I don’t see where you mention the > app? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, could you show how a new Blog post

> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> displayed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differentiate that for example from a Page creation

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modification? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the XWiki.org project >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the XWiki.org project >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com) >>>>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >>>>>>>>>>> Committer on the XWiki.org project >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com) >>>>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >>>>>>>>> Committer on the XWiki.org project >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com) >>>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >>>>>>> Committer on the XWiki.org project >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com) >>>>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >>>>>> Committer on the XWiki.org project >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com) >>>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >>>> Committer on the XWiki.org project