2 Jun
2009
2 Jun
'09
11:34 a.m.
On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
yes aggregating emails in the wiki to offer a common search UI would
be great...
On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
ok i give up, you are too strong :)
I'm just a fool because I was searching in xwiki.org about it and
not in the
mails:) On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
No I did that before you answered just because I noticed that the
thread was not referenced from the jira issue.
I'm not a bad guy, unless you consider that the following is bad:
- trying to help you
- answering quickly to your questions
- answering even though you didn't search the mail archives before
asking
;)
On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Vincent Massol
> <vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Vincent Massol
>>> <vincent(a)massol.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Pascal,
>>>>
>>>> See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok I see!
>>> And has anyone tried to hook the text renderer or at least
>>> chosen
>>> the URL?
>>> :)
>>> (?xpage=text)
>>> (?xpage=plaintext)
>>> or simply replace (?xpage=plain)
>>
>> see http://markmail.org/thread/bao6nn5qgmo7w45j
>>
>
> It is quite strange to speak with someone quoting Jira :)
That was a mail thread, not jira. I'm sorry but I don't have the
time
to copy paste all past discussions just for your pleasure or not
having to read an email thread... ;)
Really sorry about that but I'm also in a hurry looking at several
things at
the same time and I just thought I was still in JIRA without looking
at the
mail thread behind...For my (p)leasure, I will read it because it
seems to
answer my question...
> Ok Mr. Jira and do you confirm that nobody coded this part which
> routes the
> renderer to the plain text renderer when syntax is 2.0?
Hmm... why don't you look at the jira issue? There's a field named
"status" which shows if the issue has been implemented or not...
Hint: it says "open". So yes it's not been done...
I can see that but this status doesn't mean that anybody has never
tried to
code it...
but you're a bad guy making me a fool like that because you've just
modified
the JIRA in the meantime to add the mail thread in case anybody
thought I
was not silly enough :):):):) Ok joking is enough :)
When somebody knowing it will have time, it would be fine to put in
a small
page in xwiki.org the different options for xpage and the behavior
between
xwiki/1.0 and 2.0... might be useful...
The same for the jsfx module (one can find some little info about
jsx or ssx
but not jsfx or the search engine doesn't index it well)
This is not a critic because I know how difficult it is to keep doc
alive...
but for new modules like that, just a small page giving the role and
the
options would be useful...
yes definitely.
Thanks
-Vincent