Results: 7 +1, no 0, no -1
The VOTE is passed.
I’ve now updated
Note that the wording there was already covering what was proposed in this VOTE so I
haven’t touched much.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 1 Mar 2016 at 13:48:19, vincent(a)massol.net
(vincent@massol.net(mailto:vincent@massol.net)) wrote:
Hi devs,
Our rule for what we allow on xwiki.org(http://xwiki.org) is documented at
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance
The spirit is that we want to keep xwiki.org(http://xwiki.org) an open source project but
we also want that:
- it’s used to the maximum
- the max number of companies invest in committers to help develop the project
Thus we’ve agreed to have several parts of xwiki.org(http://xwiki.org) when companies
having active committers on the project can advertise for business solutions (professional
support, etc).
In order to try to increase downloads and to improve our download page Caty and I are
working on proposing some new designs (she’s already posted some and will post some more
soon). See
http://markmail.org/message/6wgmvwxl6h6pvogr and
http://markmail.org/message/ibur6fpkyx7sq7s2
As part of this effort and in order to make it even simpler to start using XWiki (and to
list all options), we’d like to refactor a bit xwiki.org(http://xwiki.org) so that people
who come on xwiki.org(http://xwiki.org) and who want to use XWiki/XE can be proposed 2
alternatives:
1) download an install XWiki on premises
2) use XWiki in the cloud or as a hosted solution
For 2) the idea is to propose playground.xwiki.org(http://playground.xwiki.org) to try
xwiki, myxwiki.org(http://myxwiki.org) (for non profit and non supported), and solutions
from companies with active committers, such as XCS from XWiki SAS (in the order with the
most committers listed first, as usual).
Please cast your vote.
Here’s my +1
Thanks
-Vincent