8 Apr
2011
8 Apr
'11
4:25 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 15:44, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 04/08/2011 03:15 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Yes I tough about that but lets say the branch is here and if there is
something really blocker we have this solution for 3.0.
For simplicity I suggest we keep working on svn
for the 3.0 branch.
The project organization is very different between 3.1 and 3.0 and I
don't see us doing the same refactoring on 3.0 branch.
It means merging stuff by hand but it's not very hard.
+1. An alternative would be to not have a 3.0.1 at all.
This strategy should be applied for the 2.7 branch.
+1 anyway we are supposed to since we already have a stable branch
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne