Sergiu,
I've done a LuceneIndexProfile that's quite different from your
description:
The idea of this interface is that it is given to the IndexUpdater and
data-objects so that they query how to best index, how to best ignore
documents or fields (important for memory usage limitation), and maybe
for custom indexing strategy.
I am not sure I grasp your cascade proposal. Which steps would it
involve?
Sure I could migrate this strategy to "abstract entities" as you
describe them but I am making this for
which runs the
curriki 1.8 branch which uses xwiki 1.5.4... so i need to be somewhat
long backwards compatible.
thanks
paul
PS: when I said central-field I meant an XWikiPrefererence field
similar to the Notification field: a reference to a groovy page
containing a class implementing the given interface. I would love to
use this for the lucene-index-profile custom class (for now I'd just
need to call the setter within the first-called-page).
Le 31-janv.-10 à 20:32, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
Probably the
nicest way I see this would be the way the notifications
are done: a central field indicates the page of a groovy source which
should implement such an interface as "LuceneIndexProfile" which
would
add such questions (maybe even including some more such as the Data
classes).
I'm not sure I understood your approach, could you explain it in
more
detail? What do you mean by "central field"?
The way I see it, each indexed field will have a reference, given by
some coordinates (this is related to the thread about object and
properties references), such as
"wiki:Space.Document^classname[index].property". There should be a
collection of filters (components implementing LuceneIndexFilter)
which
have the following method:
boolean filter(Reference entity, LuceneIndexProfile profile);
The meaning is the following:
- entity is the entity to process (could be a document, an object
property, an attachment)
- profile is the indexing profile built by the filters, initialized
with
some default values in the Lucene Plugin, and modified by the
filters as
it passes through them
- returning true means that the filtering process should stop, since
the
current filter decided that the profile is ready (for example if a
filter decided that the document should not be indexed due to security
restrictions, then it's useless to run all the other filters); by
default filters return false, letting the other filters to adjust the
profile
- each filter looks at the reference and, based on some internal
rules,
decides if it should alter the filter for this entity, and if it
considers that no more filtering is useful/needed
After the filtering is done, the plugin indexes (or not) the entity
according to the values in the profile.
This means that we could have several components affecting the Lucene
behavior, each one with particular goals in mind (security,
performance,
searchability), and each one with its own configuration.
So, what needs to be done (except writing the code) is define the
possible settings in the LuceneIndexProfile, define the filters
needed,
decide how to configure them. XML files on the server are an option,
but
one not flexible enough. Maybe objects inside the wiki will give more
flexibility to application developers. So, another thing to do is
decide
the fields needed in such a class.
Of course, if somebody needs a new filter, it's easy to add a new
jar or
write a new Groovy page in the wiki.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs