Hi devs, as part of 2.3M1, we'd like to commit and activate annotations by default in the xwiki platform. WDYT? and as a strategy we could have: 1/ jars in platform and .xar that users can install if they want -- the .xar would actually provide the interface of the annotations, js css & forms 2/ jars in platform and .xar included in XE by default I think i'd go for 2/ in M stage. If we can't stabilize it enough for final, we could get it out, but 2. would be fine for now. WDYT? Thanks, Anca _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Hi devs, as part of 2.3M1, we'd like to commit and activate annotations by default in the xwiki platform. WDYT? and as a strategy we could have: 1/ jars in platform and .xar that users can install if they want -- the .xar would actually provide the interface of the annotations, js css& forms 2/ jars in platform and .xar included in XE by default I think i'd go for 2/ in M stage. If we can't stabilize it enough for final, we could get it out, but 2. would be fine for now. WDYT? Thanks, Anca _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Hi devs, as part of 2.3M1, we'd like to commit and activate annotations by default in the xwiki platform. WDYT? and as a strategy we could have: 1/ jars in platform and .xar that users can install if they want -- the .xar would actually provide the interface of the annotations, js css & forms 2/ jars in platform and .xar included in XE by default I think i'd go for 2/ in M stage. If we can't stabilize it enough for final, we could get it out, but 2. would be fine for now. WDYT? Thanks, Anca _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs