5 Feb
2017
5 Feb
'17
11:07 a.m.
Hi devs,
Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in one way or
another to a release, and not just developers.
I can think of 3 more items to add:
A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the release (bug,
improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report an issue and thus they’ve
helped the committers to improve the quality of the release and thus they should be
acknowledged. This allows us to also ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters
who’ve also been committers or leave them in.
B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.
Ideally we would also ack:
C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it to the release.
I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits some code and often she’s
recognised through commits.
The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do it on an ad-hoc
basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when they help) instead of doing it
at the end.
In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add them to the
Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
5 Feb
5 Feb
11:09 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
On 5 Feb 2017, at 11:07, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in one way or
another to a release, and not just developers.
I can think of 3 more items to add:
s/3/a few
A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue
fixed for the release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of the release and
thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also ack QA. We could decide to
exclude the reporters who’ve also been committers or leave them in.
B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.
Ideally we would also ack:
C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it to the release.
I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits some code and often she’s
recognised through commits.
E) People helping having improved xwiki.org by contributing doc. We would need tor remove
people who modified pages by scripts (such as scheduler jobs).
Maybe E) is not that hard to do and could be included now.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to
gather. But we could do it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the
development (when they help) instead of doing it at the end.
In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add them to the
Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
6 Feb
6 Feb
10:26 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
I can think of 3 more items to add:
A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
committers or leave them in.
B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
release development.
Ideally we would also ack:
C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
they help) instead of doing it at the end.
In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
10:39 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
10:57 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
+1
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as
it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates
in
> one way or another to a release, and not just
developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the
committers to improve the quality
of
> the release and thus they should be
acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made
it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for
example. Luckily Caty also
commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through
commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could
do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the
RN during the development
(when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
4:13 p.m.
Same as Thomas.
On 02/06/2017 04:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as
it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
4:45 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
Same as Thomas too.
2017-02-06 16:13 GMT+01:00 Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org>rg>:
Same as Thomas.
On 02/06/2017 04:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long
as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
notes.
>>
>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who
participates
in
>> one way or another to a release, and not
just developers.
>>
>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>
>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
report
>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the
committers to improve the quality
of
>> the release and thus they should be
acknowledged. This allows us to
also
>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the
reporters who’ve also been
>> committers or leave them in.
>>
>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
the
>> release development.
>>
>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>
>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made
it
>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for
example. Luckily Caty also
commits
>> some code and often she’s recognised
through commits.
>>
>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we
could
do
>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to
the RN during the development
(when
> they
help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
5:33 p.m.
On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
@Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
"B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.”
?
:)
So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators during that
period.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
8:35 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
Already exist:
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBo…
What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
@Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
"B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.”
?
:)
So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators during that
period.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
8:45 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
There is a typo in the previous URL:
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBo…
I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
like "201601201".
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Already exist:
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBo…
What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
@Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
"B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.”
?
:)
So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators during that
period.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
8:46 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
(This is all modifications made to documents containing a translation object)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
There is a typo in the previous URL:
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBo…
I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
like "201601201".
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Already exist:
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBo…
What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)
@Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
"B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.”
?
:)
So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators during that
period.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>>
>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>>
>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>
>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
>> committers or leave them in.
>>
>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
>> release development.
>>
>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>
>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>>
>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>>
>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>
--
Thomas Mortagne
9 Feb
9 Feb
1:24 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
+1
Hope it won't slow down the release process too much, especially since we
release now more often. Should we do this only for final versions?
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
(This is all modifications made to documents
containing a translation
object)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
There is a typo in the previous URL:
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?
lowerBound=20161201&upperBound=20170106
I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
like "201601201".
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Already exist: http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/
BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201&upperBound=20170106
>
> What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
>>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
>>> copy/pasting the result)
>>
>> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
>> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
the release development.”
>>
>> ?
>>
>> :)
>>
>> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of
translators during that period.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>>> <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Marius
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
notes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who
participates in
>>>>> one way or another to a
release, and not just developers.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>>>>
>>>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>>>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
report
>>>>> an issue and thus they’ve
helped the committers to improve the
quality of
>>>>> the release and thus they
should be acknowledged. This allows us to
also
>>>>> ack QA. We could decide to
exclude the reporters who’ve also been
>>>>> committers or leave them in.
>>>>>
>>>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start
of the
>>>>> release development.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>>>>
>>>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>>>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that
made it
>>>>> to the release. I’m thinking
of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also
commits
>>>>> some code and often she’s
recognised through commits.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we
could do
>>>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by
adding them to the RN during the
development (when
>>>>> they help) instead of doing
it at the end.
>>>>>
>>>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to
add
>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re
easy to find out.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
1:49 p.m.
Yes, I’d do that only for final releases (but including the participations for the RC
ofc).
Thanks
-Vincent
On 9 Feb 2017, at 13:24, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Hope it won't slow down the release process too much, especially since we
release now more often. Should we do this only for final versions?
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> (This is all modifications made to documents containing a translation
> object)
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> There is a typo in the previous URL:
>> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?
> lowerBound=20161201&upperBound=20170106
>>
>> I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
>> like "201601201".
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>> Already exist: http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/
> BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201&upperBound=20170106
>>>
>>> What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's
automated or
>>>>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
>>>>> copy/pasting the result)
>>>>
>>>> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
>>>> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start
of
> the release development.”
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> :)
>>>>
>>>> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of
> translators during that period.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>>>>> <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Marius
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the
Release
> notes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who
> participates in
>>>>>>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed
for the
>>>>>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the
time to
> report
>>>>>>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve
the
> quality of
>>>>>>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows
us to
> also
>>>>>>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also
been
>>>>>>> committers or leave them in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the
start
> of the
>>>>>>> release development.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>>>>>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals
that
> made it
>>>>>>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily
Caty also
> commits
>>>>>>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather.
But we
> could do
>>>>>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the
> development (when
>>>>>>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m
proposing to
> add
>>>>>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>
6 Feb
6 Feb
5:11 p.m.
On 5 Feb 2017, at 11:07, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in one way or
another to a release, and not just developers.
I can think of 3 more items to add:
A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the release (bug,
improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report an issue and thus they’ve
helped the committers to improve the quality of the release and thus they should be
acknowledged. This allows us to also ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters
who’ve also been committers or leave them in.
Here’s how to automate this:
{{groovy}}
def jql = URLEncoder.encode('category = "Top Level Projects" AND (fixVersion
= "9.0-rc-1" OR fixVersion = "9.0") AND resolution = Fixed AND
component != "Development Issues only"', "UTF-8")
def columns = "field=reporter"
def url =
"http://jira.xwiki.org/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-xml/temp/SearchRequest.xml?jqlQuery=${jql}&${columns}".toURL().text
def root = new XmlSlurper().parseText(url)
def reporters = [] as TreeSet
root.channel.item.each() {
reporters.add(it.reporter.toString())
}
println "{{{"
reporters.each() {
println "* ${it}"
}
println "}}}"
{{/groovy}}
Thanks
-Vincent
B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the release
development.
Ideally we would also ack:
C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it to the release.
I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits some code and often she’s
recognised through commits.
The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do it on an
ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when they help) instead of
doing it at the end.
In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add them to the
Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
2776
days inactive
2780
days old
13 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Alexandru Cotiuga -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Guillaume Delhumeau -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol