+1 for final versions
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1, definitely.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> +1
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:11 PM,
vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
> > Hi devs,
>
> > As you know our goal is to
use
myxwiki.org as a real life test
platform
> to validate releases of XWiki.
>
> > Current Situation
> > ==================
>
> > However this is currently
not working very well for 2 reasons:
>
> > 1) We’re always lagging
behind on the version installed on
myxwiki.org
.
> Right now it’s 7.1.2 and our last released version is 7.3M2. Thus if we
> notice a problem on
myxwiki.org, it’ll be fixed only in much later
> versions and
myxwiki.org is not playing its role of helping validate
> releases before we release final versions.
>
> > 2) We don’t really monitor
the performance of
myxwiki.org.
>
> > 3) We don’t really analyse
issues that can happen on it because we
don’t
> check the logs.
>
> > Thus I think we need to
find a better process for benefitting from
>
myxwiki.org.
>
> > Question
> > =========
>
> > Are we still interested in
benefitting from
myxwiki.org for testing
our
> releases?
>
> > If not, then stop reading
at this point :)
> > If we are, then I’m making some proposals below.
>
> > Proposal
> > =========
>
> > For 1):
>
> > I’d like to propose to add
a step in our ReleasePlan template as the
> last step:
> > - Check the
myxwiki.org upgrade roster and ping the next person to
> update
myxwiki.org
>
> > So the idea would be to not
make the RM do the upgrade since he/she
> already has a lot to do to release XWiki but to make him/her responsible
> for pinging someone to do it. Then we would take turn to upgrade it (in a
> similar fashion as we do for releasing XWiki).
>
> > Note that I believe this
would also make us work on making it simpler
to
> perform XWiki upgrades and this would benefit our users. We would eat our
> own dog food basically :)
>
> > For 2):
>
> > Here are ideas of what we
could monitor and receive alerts when they go
> beyond a given threshold:
> > - the average response times users get on it,
> > - when a specific requests takes more than N seconds (this would also
> allow us to find wiki pages written by our users and which take too much
> CPU thus making the farm slower than it should be),
> > - its uptime
> > - the memory used
>
> > For 3):
>
> > I think we could set up
some elastic search/kibana solution as we had
> set up at some point (this makes it nice to browse and search for logs)
and
then send automatic mails to the devs list or IRC
when exception happen.
This would have the nice benefit of making us work on fixing the code and
not generating exceptions when we have only warnings that don’t impact
the
> stability of the platform.
>
> > WDYT?
>
> > If we agree, then we’ll
need to discuss how to setup 2 and 3.
>
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
>
> >
_______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > devs(a)xwiki.org
> >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs