9 Jan
2014
9 Jan
'14
3:50 p.m.
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. (
http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source
code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key
ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance,
Sorin B.
9 Jan
9 Jan
4:36 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application
2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. (
http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source
code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key
ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance,
Sorin B.
10 Jan
10 Jan
9:07 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I
see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application
2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
(after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that,
for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
expectation
on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I have heard
several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful
extension.
Cheers,
Clemens
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and
> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. (
> http://activiti.org/)
>
> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source
> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key
> ACTIVITI.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sorin B.
>
9:46 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the
Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an
application.
The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of
the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the
wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project
name. I see 2 possible
names:
1) Activiti Application
2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
(after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does
that,
for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
expectation
on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I
have heard
several users asking for something like that because they consider it a
very useful extension.
Cheers,
Clemens
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
and
> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source
workflow execution engine. (
> http://activiti.org/)
>
> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
source
> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti
Application with the key
> ACTIVITI.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sorin B.
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:59 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
After consulting with Vincent, I decided that Activiti Application is
better suited for the JIRA project name.
Thanks
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the
Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an
application.
The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of
the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the
wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project
name. I see 2 possible
names:
1) Activiti Application
2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
(after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does
that,
for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
expectation
on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I
have heard
several users asking for something like that because they consider it a
very useful extension.
Cheers,
Clemens
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
and
> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source
workflow execution engine.
(
> http://activiti.org/)
>
> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
source
> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti
Application with the key
> ACTIVITI.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sorin B.
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:29 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is
pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration,
scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something
useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the
Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an
application.
The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of
the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the
wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible
> names:
>>
>> 1) Activiti Application
>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
>> Integration for CRaSH)
>>
>> WDYT ?
>
> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
>
> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does
> that,
> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
> expectation
> on the UI side.
>
> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I
> have heard
> several users asking for something like that because they consider it a
> very useful extension.
>
> Cheers,
> Clemens
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sorin B.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
> and
>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. (
>>> http://activiti.org/)
>>>
>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
> source
>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key
>>> ACTIVITI.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Sorin B.
>>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
5:59 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
I agree, application sounds more appropriate.
I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Most of the applications are an integration with
something: IRC is
pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration,
scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something
useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the
Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an
application.
The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of
the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the
wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible
> names:
>>
>> 1) Activiti Application
>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
>> Integration for CRaSH)
>>
>> WDYT ?
>
> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
>
> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does
> that,
> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
> expectation
> on the UI side.
>
> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact
I
> have heard
> several users asking for something like that because they consider it a
> very useful extension.
>
> Cheers,
> Clemens
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sorin B.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
> and
>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution
engine.
(
>>> http://activiti.org/)
>>>
>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
> source
>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key
>>> ACTIVITI.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Sorin B.
>>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
20 Feb
20 Feb
11:12 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
I have released the Activiti Application.
Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ?
Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned
automatically to me
Thanks,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate.
I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Most of the applications are an integration with
something: IRC is
pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration,
scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something
useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in
the
Applications Panel. So from this point of view,
it can be seen as an
application.
The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of
the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the
wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible
> names:
>>
>> 1) Activiti Application
>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
>> Integration for CRaSH)
>>
>> WDYT ?
>
> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
>
> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does
> that,
> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
> expectation
> on the UI side.
>
> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in
fact I
> have heard
> several users asking for something like that because they consider it a
> very useful extension.
>
> Cheers,
> Clemens
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sorin B.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between
XWiki
> and
>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution
engine.
(
>>> http://activiti.org/)
>>>
>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
> source
>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the
key
>>> ACTIVITI.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Sorin B.
>>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:49 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Hi Sorin,
On 20 Feb 2014 at 11:13:18, Sorin Burjan
(sorin.burjan@gmail.com(mailto:sorin.burjan@gmail.com)) wrote:
I have released the Activiti Application.
Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ?
Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned
automatically to me
You should check IRC. You already asked there and we (I) replied there :)
sburjan: done, see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XACTIVITII
sburjan: you could create a first jira and close it with a fixversion of 1.0
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate.
I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Most of the applications are an integration with
something: IRC is
pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration,
scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something
useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in
the
Applications Panel. So from this point of view,
it can be seen as an
application.
The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of
the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the
wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible
> names:
>>
>> 1) Activiti Application
>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
>> Integration for CRaSH)
>>
>> WDYT ?
>
> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
>
> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box"
> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does
> that,
> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower
> expectation
> on the UI side.
>
> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in
fact I
> have heard
> several users asking for something like that because they consider it a
> very useful extension.
>
> Cheers,
> Clemens
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sorin B.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between
XWiki
> and
>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution
engine.
(
>>> http://activiti.org/)
>>>
>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
> source
>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the
key
>>> ACTIVITI.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Sorin B.
>>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
27 Feb
27 Feb
3:30 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Hi Sorin,
I've managed to install the Activiti integration. I modified the page on
extensions and added a zip of the libraries to make it easier for people to
install.
I haven't tested because I need to create a process. It would be nice to
include a process sample on the extension page to make it easier for people
to check what can be done.
Otherwise it looks quite cool.
Ludovic
2014-02-20 11:12 GMT+01:00 Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)gmail.com>om>:
I have released the Activiti Application.
Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ?
Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned
automatically to me
Thanks,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Ludovic Dubost
Founder and CEO
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate.
I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is
> pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration,
> scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something
> useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
>
> On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
> > Hello Clemens,
> >
> > This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
> > Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in
> the
> > Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an
> > application.
> > The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than
most
of
> > the ones we have on extensions. It
integrates another sub-system in
the
> > wiki if you'd like to see it that
way.
> > So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sorin B.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
> > c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible
> >> names:
> >>>
> >>> 1) Activiti Application
> >>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash
> >>> Integration for CRaSH)
> >>>
> >>> WDYT ?
> >>
> >> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends".
;)
> >>
> >> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the
box"
> >> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really
does
> >> that,
> >> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat
lower
> >> expectation
> >> on the UI side.
> >>
> >> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in
> fact I
> >> have heard
> >> several users asking for something like that because they consider
it
a
> >> very useful extension.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Clemens
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Sorin B.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <
sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between
XWiki
> and
>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution
engine.
(
>>> http://activiti.org/)
>>>
>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the
> source
>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the
key
>>> ACTIVITI.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Sorin B.
>>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6 Mar
6 Mar
9:20 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Hello Ludovic and everybody,
I have added 5 sample processes and I have mention about them
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Activiti+Application#H…
For everybody who wants to try out he application and has questions or
encounters issues, please ask on the mailing lists or create JIRA issues.
I've put a lot of effort in creating the application and I'd love to see it
used by the community.
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi Sorin,
I've managed to install the Activiti integration. I modified the page on
extensions and added a zip of the libraries to make it easier for people to
install.
I haven't tested because I need to create a process. It would be nice to
include a process sample on the extension page to make it easier for people
to check what can be done.
Otherwise it looks quite cool.
Ludovic
2014-02-20 11:12 GMT+01:00 Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)gmail.com>om>:
the
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Ludovic Dubost
Founder and CEO
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
I have released the Activiti Application.
Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ?
Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned
automatically to me
Thanks,
Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com
in
wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate.
I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>
>> Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is
>> pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration,
>> scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something
>> useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
>>
>> On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
>> > Hello Clemens,
>> >
>> > This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI:
>> > Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension >> the
>> > Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an
>> > application.
>> > The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application
than
most
of
possible
> > the ones we have on extensions. It
integrates another sub-system in
the
>> > wiki if you'd like to see it that way.
>> > So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Sorin B.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar <
>> > c.robbenhaar(a)espresto.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 >> >> names:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1) Activiti Application
>> >>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen
Crash
>> >>> Integration for CRaSH)
>> >>>
>> >>> WDYT ?
>> >>
>> >> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it
depends".
;)
>> >>
>> >> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the
box"
>
>> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really
does
> >> that,
> >> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat
lower
> >> expectation
> >> on the UI side.
> >>
> >> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in
> fact I
> >> have heard
> >> several users asking for something like that because they consider
it
a
> >> very useful extension.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Clemens
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Sorin B.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <
sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hello,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration
between
>> XWiki
>> >> and
>> >>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution
>> engine. (
>> >>>> http://activiti.org/)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve
it.
>> >>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti
for >> >> source
>> >>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with
the
key
>>>> ACTIVITI.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> Sorin B.
>>>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10 Jan
10 Jan
1:01 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Done for Github:
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-activiti
Enjoy
-Vincent
On 9 Jan 2014 at 15:51:02, Sorin Burjan (sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com) wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. (
http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it.
For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source
code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key
ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance,
Sorin B.
3943
days inactive
3999
days old
11 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar -
Ludovic Dubost -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Sorin Burjan -
Sorin Burjan -
vincent＠massol.net