20 May
2011
20 May
'11
11:29 a.m.
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
--
Thomas Mortagne
20 May
20 May
11:38 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [IDEA] Distribute javadb based instead of hsqldb based packages
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK?
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent
11:39 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [IDEA] Distribute javadb based instead of hsqldb based packages
Also I think I'd prefer using the latest version from derby rather than the repackaged
version by Oracle...
-Vincent
On May 20, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK?
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent
11:40 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [IDEA] Distribute javadb based instead of hsqldb based packages
And I'm not yet 100% convinced of Derby vs H2.
H2 is a potential contender I think too.
Would need some pros/cons of each.
-Vincent
On May 20, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Also I think I'd prefer using the latest version
from derby rather than the repackaged version by Oracle...
-Vincent
On May 20, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK?
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent
11:53 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [IDEA] Distribute javadb based instead of hsqldb based packages
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:40, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
And I'm not yet 100% convinced of Derby vs H2.
H2 is a potential contender I think too.
Would need some pros/cons of each.
IMO all we need to know is if javadb is enough for this distribution
which again never targeted heavy performance production.
-Vincent
On May 20, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Also I think I'd prefer using the latest
version from derby rather than the repackaged version by Oracle...
-Vincent
On May 20, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK?
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent
11:59 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [IDEA] Distribute javadb based instead of hsqldb based packages
Wouldn't it help more incremental debugging to have something that works across
restarts fast?
paul
Le 20 mai 2011 à 11:53, Thomas Mortagne a écrit :
H2 is a
potential contender I think too.
Would need some pros/cons of each.
IMO all we need to know is if javadb is enough for this distribution
which again never targeted heavy performance production.
11:50 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [IDEA] Distribute javadb based instead of hsqldb based packages
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:38, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK? From what I understood when java6 has been released
it's part of java
6 standard, At least I never seen anything suggesting that it
was only
in Sun/Oracle implementation.
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
1:52 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [IDEA] Distribute javadb based instead of hsqldb based packages
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:50, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:38, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Just checked on Ubuntu and javadb is not part of sun-java6-jre so I
guess that means it's the same pretty much everywhere.
So this IDEA become -1 for me :)
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
From what I understood when java6 has been released it's part of java
6 standard, At least I never seen anything suggesting that it was only
in Sun/Oracle implementation. Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK?
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
25 May
25 May
8:04 a.m.
On 05/20/2011 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
I'd rather upgrade to a more recent version of HSQLDB. The authors were
kind enough to solve a few bugs that were causing problems for us when
upgrading an older database.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
4916
days inactive
4921
days old
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Paul Libbrecht -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol