Update: I've just done this for xwiki-plugins to try it out. Let me know if
it's an issuer for anyone and I'll revert it.
Please let me know also whether you're ok to do it for the rest too.
Thanks
-Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vincent@massol.net]
Sent: samedi 21 octobre 2006 10:13
To: xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org
Subject: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] svn dirs reorganization
Hi,
Following my post entitled "[Proposal] Plugins and xwiki distributions"
I'd like to propose that we reorganize our SVN. Here's what I propose:
xwiki/
|_ xwiki/
|_ trunks/
|_ branches/
|_ tags/
|_ xwiki-plugins/
|_ trunks/
|_ emailnotification/
|_ lucene/
|_ ...
|_ branches/
|_ tags/
|_ xwiki-apps/
|_ trunks/
|_ branches/
|_ tags/
|_ xwiki-clients/
|_ trunks/
|_ branches/
|_ tags/
|_ xwiki-sandbox/
|_ trunks/
|_ branches/
|_ tags/
|_ xwiki-tools/
|_ trunks/
|_ branches/
|_ tags/
The rationale:
* It's really cumbersome to have trunks/, tags/ and branches/ for each
single module. It's easier and better to have only one per category
(xwiki, xwiki-apps, xwiki-clients, etc). Of course each project inside
these can still release in its own lifecycle and tag independently. For
example check the plugins/tags/ dir for Maven
(
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/) and you'll see
that each plugin is released separately.
* Having trunks/ at different levels doesn't sound like a good idea.
Actually I discovered this when trying to create svn:externals for all
trunks. The same would happen if you tried to check out all the trunks
manually. You would currently get some directories that are not under
version control (xwiki-plugins/, xwiki-clients/, etc). The reason is
that there's no way to check the contents of these directories by
taking only the trunks and still having them under svn control.
Thus my belief is that trunks/ dir at different directory levels in a
SVN directory is not a good idea if everything is in the same project.
Again a good structure is shown by Maven:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/ (all the trunks/ are at the
same
level)
* Last, we have a gelc/gelcv1 dir. I don't think we should put version
in the directory structure but rather use trunks and branches for this.
I think it'd be better to use the trunk for v1 and when a v2 comes out,
move the v1 to a branch and the v2 to the trunk.
I'd like to reorganize the svn tree to follow what I've defined above.
Let me know if you're ok for me to do it. As some of you might have
some uncommitted changes in your local repo let me know if I can do it.
I'd like to start with the xwiki-plugins/ tree.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________________________________
____
Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos
questions !
Demandez ` ceux qui savent sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
___________________________________________________________________________
D�couvrez une nouvelle fa�on d'obtenir des r�ponses � toutes vos questions !
Demandez � ceux qui savent sur Yahoo! Questions/R�ponses