Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r17880 - in platform/web/trunk: . wysiwyg wysiwyg/src/main/java wysiwyg/src/test/java wysiwyg/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/wysiwyg/client/widget xwiki-gwt-dom xwiki-gwt-dom/src xwiki-gwt-dom/src/main xwiki-gwt-dom/src/main/java xwiki-gwt-dom/src/main/java/org xwiki-gwt-dom/src/test xwiki-gwt-dom/src/test/java xwiki-gwt-dom/src/test/java/org xwiki-gwt-dom/src/test/java/org/xwiki/gwt/dom/client - xwiki-devs@xwiki.org

23 Mar 2009

On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:

...
  Hi Anca,

 Anca Paula Luca wrote:
  mflorea (SVN) wrote:
  Author: mflorea
 Date: 2009-03-20 19:48:20 +0100 (Fri, 20 Mar 2009)
 New Revision: 17880

 Added:
   platform/web/trunk/wysiwyg/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/wysiwyg/ 
 client/widget/MockEvent.java
   platform/web/trunk/xwiki-gwt-dom/ 
 actually, could we have this just gwt-dom ? for consistency with  
 the others
 module names. 
 I thought it's consistent with:

http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/platform/core/trunk/xwiki-rendering/xwik…

 I replaced "core" with "web" and "rendering" with
"gwt".

  We could also think about putting it under gwt in
this case, but  
 the truth is
 that that one should be renamed into xwiki-gwt since that one is  
 xwiki specific
 API and this one is generic. 
 Yes, I had in mind: platform/web/xwiki-gwt/xwiki-gwt-dom but I said to
 myself that we should wait till we have more than one module to put
 inside xwiki-gwt. Also note that xwiki-rendering is pretty generic and
 still prefixed with xwiki. I think it's good like this.

 I could have moved/renamed the gwt module to
 platform/web/xwiki-gwt/xwiki-gwt-api but I wanted to know first how is
 this move going to affect the projects using it, like Curriki.

 My target is something like:

 platform/web/xwiki-gwt
     /xwiki-gwt-api     (the current gwt module)
     /xwiki-gwt-diff    (used for real-time editing)
     /xwiki-gwt-dom
     /xwiki-gwt-rta     (the rich text area used by the WYSIWYG)
     /xwiki-gwt-wysiwyg 
Sounds good to me as a first step. The following step would be to move  
some modules to top level project status.

Thanks
-Vincent