OK with me. Should I imagine XWiki without velocity? Why not, there could be a XWiki distribution based on JSP, or one based on XML+RDF+XQuey +XSLT. Maybe XWiki 3.0 will have these. We should ask ourself if this is possible when we design the architecture. The core will be correctly defined when we can easily achieve this goal.

On 3/20/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose the following general principles for the V2 Architecture (http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Idea/ ArchitectureV2 ): * XWiki Core API is made only of interfaces. These are all the interfaces that are implemented by components * XWiki Components are simple java classes (POJO) implementing the XWiki interfaces. * XWiki Core Distributions consist in XWiki Core + some chosen components. Our current XWiki will be a Core Distribution. * XWiki Containers are special modules that integrate XWiki in a given container. For example: integration in Servlet Containers (this means a web.xml file, servlet context listeners, packaging in a WAR, etc), in Portlet Container, in J2ME environments, etc. XWiki Containers depend on XWiki Core Distributions. Are we ok with this? If so, I'll move that to http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Idea/ ArchitectureV2 Thanks -Vincent PS: I'll keep sending some Architecture ideas so that we start shaping up our Architecture document and so that everyone has a clear idea of what's happening and can participate. -- http://purl.org/net/sergiu -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki- dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/ wws