Ok, so this is a little script reporting usage. It looks ok but I need to touch software. I could not build your project because of checkstyle errors. Could you fix that? Also, I insist on forking for me to see the diffs. And please remember my request for readme to explain a typical deployment. thanks in advance paul PS: what's your regular work schedule? Le 5 avr. 2012 à 04:57, savitha sundaramurthy a écrit : https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1-2GqvjtzS_a8TRKDNsom9egDZHTT5xIzUf… wrote: I implemented code day git _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Hi Paul, On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Paul Libbrecht <paul(a)hoplahup.net> wrote: My code is here: https://github.com/savee1/xwiki-platform/tree/SOLR/xwiki-platform-core/xwik… I have forked the code, Sent a pull request to fabio. My commit and the list of diffs for all the files.

https://github.com/savee1/xwiki-platform/commit/5bb50fe2ddb12c1ef68fb83e096… I have added the README document too with detailed steps on how to set it up.  I stay in Arizona, its Mountain Standard Time  ( -7 ).  I have classes from morning till evening. I'll be available in IRC in the night and full time during weekends [?]  In summer, except for my thesis work( 20 hours a week) I'm free the other time. -- best regards, Savitha.s _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:32 PM, savitha sundaramurthy <savitha.s131(a)gmail.com> wrote: Yep I've seen it, though I don't think it's the correct way to proceed. The pull request, in fact, is sent to a branch of a fork in my account. I think that this kind of development should be done in a more "institutional" place like xwiki-contrib. Moreover, since I am not the mentor for this project, I am not entitled to merge pull requests. So I propose to open a fork of xwiki-platform in xwiki-contrib, and that Savitha works on that fork and (re)send pull requests there. WDYT?

Le 8 avr. 2012 à 04:07, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit : Fabio, I insisted on a fork from your repo (with the right branch, that was the trick I and Savitha failed to catch for a while) so that we can evaluate the contribution of Savitha to this work. He found it independently of me. This is now visible in commit: https://github.com/savee1/xwiki-platform/commit/5bb50fe2ddb12c1ef68fb83e096… In all cases, I think the work of Savitha will be on his GitHub repo, at best as a branch from xwiki directly, where a pull request will be able to be formulated. I wouldn't be surprised, however, that several pull requests will be needed in a non-linear way so that things will not be as simple as GitHub wishes us to be. In this case, there will be diff juggling. Maybe it will be even easier that he makes a new repo, not based on others, so that it becomes something people can deploy when they feel its ready. The big repos at GitHub are not too friendly for this kind of sub-modules unfortunately (this is a great loss to my taste compared to svn). So... what is the procedure to review his work and give our ranking? Is this only in Melange or is there a way inside? I haven't been able to check, yet, if it runs as desired...

Hi Savitha, This is quite cool. I'm quite impressed at the speed you learned to do components and manage to do a first basic implementation. It indeed seems to show that SOLR is a good choice. I've one remark which is the usage of a SOLR Embedded server. I think one of the interesting features of SOLR is also that we can split the search engine which the XWiki engine.

It would be great to have the choice between both solutions (embedded and not embedded). By default we would bundle the embedded version and for high performance installation it should be possible to separate the SOLR engine and still share most of the logic. Keep up the good work Ludovic 2012/4/5 savitha sundaramurthy <savitha.s131(a)gmail.com> -- Ludovic Dubost Founder and CEO Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Thanks Ludovic and Guillaume. As Fabio pointed out changing the instantiation of SolrServer(), new EmbeddedServer() , or CommonHttpServer() will do. If any case, there is something else to offer I'll make it into two different components. Am really looking forward to work with XWiki community. Thanks , Savitha On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote: > Hi Savitha, > > This is quite cool. I'm quite impressed at the speed you learned to do > components and manage to do a first basic implementation. > It indeed seems to show that SOLR is a good choice. > > I've one remark which is the usage of a SOLR Embedded server. I think one > of the interesting features of SOLR is also that we can split the search > engine which the XWiki engine. > It would be great to have the choice between both solutions (embedded and > not embedded). By default we would bundle the embedded version and for high > performance installation it should be possible to separate the SOLR engine > and still share most of the logic. > > Keep up the good work > > Ludovic > > 2012/4/5 savitha sundaramurthy <savitha.s131(a)gmail.com> > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Here is the link to the document >> >> >> > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1-2GqvjtzS_a8TRKDNsom9egDZHTT5xIzUf… >> >> Thanks a lot, >> Savitha >> >> >>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Paul Libbrecht <paul(a)hoplahup.net> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Savitha, >>>> >>>> things are moving. This is good. >>>> >>>> Do you have a (temporary) server address where this could be tested? >>>> (maybe best over IRC?). >>>> Or, how could I build your code and inject it on a fresh XWiki? >>>> >>>> Le 4 avr. 2012 à 18:46, savitha sundaramurthy a écrit : >>>>> I went through Fabio Mancinelli's code and with the help of >> few >>>>> inputs from there , I have implemented a basic search functionality >>>> using >>>>> solr. It also fixes the issue > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-6226. >> I >>>>> have indexed the page in English, french and Spanish. I have >> implemented >>>>> these main functionality: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Simple text search using solr. >>>>> 2) Used *Extended Dismax Parser *to customize search relevancy using >>>> boost >>>>> index. >>>> >>>> which fixes well the apostrophe case for sure (and a zillion other >>>> ambiguities, and another zillion power user tricks). >>>> >>>>> 3) Hit highlighting for English. >>>> >>>> This is a good usage of solr. >>>> >>>>> Below is the link to the source code >>>>> https://github.com/savis/xwiki-platform-search >>>>> XWiki front end , HTML and Velocity code >>>>> >>>>> https://gist.github.com/2295648 >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to send a pull request but I was playing around when > renaming >>>> my >>>>> username and deleted the forked repository and I'm having difficulty >>>>> forking it again. So I have created a new repository and shared the >> code >>>>> above. >>>> >>>> I think forking is really useful. If not today, it will be needed any >> day >>>> soon. >>>> We need to see the diffs. >>>> Best would be to create the fork again, then copy your files and let > git >>>> give us the diff. >>>> >>>>> I have taken few screen shots and have attached the document. >>>> >>>> where? >>>> >>>>> I'm working on my application and it should be done today. >>>> >>>> What is the planned schedule? >>>>

Hi Paul,       Thanks a lot for your comments. practice as I created one to find  the necessary steps to set it   up. I prefer having a complete documentation in dev wiki or extension wiki.    This is little confusing, dunno how the community follows it. As said by Fabio, if we are going to use XWiki Contrib repository its    good to start with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT (using Continuos Integration ) or 1.0.0. If this is going into platform it should be    4.x-SNAPSHOT. I see the master repository is on 4.x in github.

Recently, I found out that there is one more file called    xwiki.properties, looks like its a better place to set up the configuration.

   May be we can include the solr configuration inside WEB-INF of  xwiki enterprise and pick it up from there.    Sorry, its my mistake. Am going to rectify it.   I haven't spent much time here. The developed component can be considered as  Proof Of Concept with SOLR. It needs to be    refined and standardized.    Yes, I have that in mind. I need to spend more time on how XE is build, how the artifacts and configuration files are picked     up.   Sorry for missing that out .    Savitha. -- best regards, Savitha.s _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs