Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r17602 - in platform/core/trunk: xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/org/xwiki/cache/tests xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-portlet/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/portlet xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-servlet/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/servlet xwiki-core/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/test
13 Mar
2009
13 Mar
'09
8:23 a.m.
Hi Sergiu,
On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:38 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2009-03-13 00:38:08 +0100 (Fri, 13 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 17602
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/main/
java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-portlet/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/portlet/PortletApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-servlet/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/servlet/ServletApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/test/
TestApplicationContext.java
Log:
XWIKI-3312: Add a getTemporaryDirectory() method to ApplicationContext
Done.
Patch submitted by Dan Miron, enhanced and extended.
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/
java/org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java 2009-03-12 23:03:56 UTC
(rev 17601)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java 2009-03-12 23:38:08 UTC
(rev 17602)
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
*/
package org.xwiki.cache.tests;
+import java.io.File;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
import java.net.URL;
@@ -130,6 +131,21 @@
}
/**
+ * {@inheritDoc}
+ *
+ * @see
org.xwiki.container.ApplicationContext#getTemporaryDirectory()
+ */
+ public File getTemporaryDirectory()
+ {
+ try {
+ // The system temporary directory is a good place for
temporary test data.
+ return new File(System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir"));
+ } catch (SecurityException e) {
+ return new File(".");
+ }
+ }
I don't understand why you had to modify the cache module.
+
+ /**
* @return a instance of the cache factory.
* @throws Exception error when searching for cache factory
component.
*/
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/
src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java 2009-03-12
23:03:56 UTC (rev 17601)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java 2009-03-12
23:38:08 UTC (rev 17602)
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
*/
package org.xwiki.container;
+import java.io.File;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
import java.net.URL;
@@ -27,5 +28,15 @@
public interface ApplicationContext
{
InputStream getResourceAsStream(String resourceName);
+
URL getResource(String resourceName) throws MalformedURLException;
+
+ /**
+ * Gets the directory which the container must provide for
storing temporary data. The contents of this directory
+ * may be deleted between container restarts (<em>temporary</
em>, as the name implies), so it is not a safe place to
+ * store permanent/important data.
+ *
+ * @return a {@link File} object pointing to a directory that
the application can use for storing temporary files
+ */
+ File getTemporaryDirectory();
I don't like this too much but it's ok for now. However I don't think
this is a good generic solution for the future. I think it would be
better to implement a temporary storage that uses the same storage api
as the other storages (main storage, version storage, attachment
storage, etc). The pb with returning a File is that 1) it ties us to a
disk storage which might not be available in all environments for
various reasons and 2) it's not extensible and you cannot swap another
implementation (like it you want to use a memory storage for example).
For this we need the new storage/model of course which is why it's ok
to have this now.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
13 Mar
13 Mar
11:31 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r17602 - in platform/core/trunk: xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/org/xwiki/cache/tests xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-portlet/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/portlet xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-servlet/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/servlet xwiki-core/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/test
Vincent Massol wrote:
Yes, but this is not a storage, it's a temporary directory on the
server. If we want to implement a temporary storage based on files, it
will need to get a temporary directory. It seems normal to me that an
environment should provide access to a place where to store data.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Hi Sergiu,
On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:38 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Because it implements ApplicationContext, don't ask me why it does
that... I was pretty surprised by this also.
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2009-03-13 00:38:08 +0100 (Fri, 13 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 17602
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/main/
java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-portlet/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/portlet/PortletApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-servlet/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/servlet/ServletApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/test/
TestApplicationContext.java
Log:
XWIKI-3312: Add a getTemporaryDirectory() method to ApplicationContext
Done.
Patch submitted by Dan Miron, enhanced and extended.
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/
java/org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java 2009-03-12 23:03:56 UTC
(rev 17601)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java 2009-03-12 23:38:08 UTC
(rev 17602)
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
*/
package org.xwiki.cache.tests;
+import java.io.File;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
import java.net.URL;
@@ -130,6 +131,21 @@
}
/**
+ * {@inheritDoc}
+ *
+ * @see
org.xwiki.container.ApplicationContext#getTemporaryDirectory()
+ */
+ public File getTemporaryDirectory()
+ {
+ try {
+ // The system temporary directory is a good place for
temporary test data.
+ return new File(System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir"));
+ } catch (SecurityException e) {
+ return new File(".");
+ }
+ }
I don't understand why you had to modify the cache module. +
+ /**
* @return a instance of the cache factory.
* @throws Exception error when searching for cache factory
component.
*/
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/
src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java 2009-03-12
23:03:56 UTC (rev 17601)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java 2009-03-12
23:38:08 UTC (rev 17602)
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
*/
package org.xwiki.container;
+import java.io.File;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
import java.net.URL;
@@ -27,5 +28,15 @@
public interface ApplicationContext
{
InputStream getResourceAsStream(String resourceName);
+
URL getResource(String resourceName) throws MalformedURLException;
+
+ /**
+ * Gets the directory which the container must provide for
storing temporary data. The contents of this directory
+ * may be deleted between container restarts (<em>temporary</
em>, as the name implies), so it is not a safe place to
+ * store permanent/important data.
+ *
+ * @return a {@link File} object pointing to a directory that
the application can use for storing temporary files
+ */
+ File getTemporaryDirectory();
I don't like this too much but it's ok for now. However I don't think
this is a good generic solution for the future. I think it would be
better to implement a temporary storage that uses the same storage api
as the other storages (main storage, version storage, attachment
storage, etc). The pb with returning a File is that 1) it ties us to a
disk storage which might not be available in all environments for
various reasons and 2) it's not extensible and you cannot swap another
implementation (like it you want to use a memory storage for example).
For this we need the new storage/model of course which is why it's ok
to have this now.
WDYT?
11:46 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r17602 - in platform/core/trunk: xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/org/xwiki/cache/tests xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-portlet/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/portlet xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-servlet/src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/servlet xwiki-core/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/test
On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Yes, but this is not a storage, it's a temporary directory on the
server. If we want to implement a temporary storage based on files, it
will need to get a temporary directory.
It seems normal to me that an
environment should provide access to a place where to store data.
In cargo I had used commons vfs for all file storage and this was
quite nice since it's independent of the underlying FS implementation
and it was providing several implementations (FS, ftp, http, memory,
etc).
http://commons.apache.org/vfs/filesystems.html
That project is a bit dead now I think unfortunately but the idea was
very nice and that's what I had in mind.
Once nice side effect was the ability to easily write unit tests for
file-based IO easily without going to the file system:
http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/vmassol/archives/think_tank.html#001370_ea…
It might be overkill for now. Just a thought.
-Vincent
Vincent Massol wrote:
Thomas? This looks wrong and it certainly is since there's code
duplication.
Hi Sergiu,
On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:38 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Because it implements ApplicationContext, don't ask me why it does
that... I was pretty surprised by this also. Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2009-03-13 00:38:08 +0100 (Fri, 13 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 17602
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/main/
java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-portlet/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/portlet/PortletApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-servlet/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/servlet/ServletApplicationContext.java
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/test/java/com/xpn/xwiki/test/
TestApplicationContext.java
Log:
XWIKI-3312: Add a getTemporaryDirectory() method to
ApplicationContext
Done.
Patch submitted by Dan Miron, enhanced and extended.
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/
main/
java/org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java 2009-03-12 23:03:56 UTC
(rev 17601)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-tests/src/main/java/
org/xwiki/cache/tests/AbstractTestCache.java 2009-03-12 23:38:08 UTC
(rev 17602)
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
*/
package org.xwiki.cache.tests;
+import java.io.File;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
import java.net.URL;
@@ -130,6 +131,21 @@
}
/**
+ * {@inheritDoc}
+ *
+ * @see
org.xwiki.container.ApplicationContext#getTemporaryDirectory()
+ */
+ public File getTemporaryDirectory()
+ {
+ try {
+ // The system temporary directory is a good place for
temporary test data.
+ return new File(System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir"));
+ } catch (SecurityException e) {
+ return new File(".");
+ }
+ }
I don't understand why you had to modify the cache module. +
+ /**
* @return a instance of the cache factory.
* @throws Exception error when searching for cache factory
component.
*/
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/
src/main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java 2009-03-12
23:03:56 UTC (rev 17601)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-containers/xwiki-container-api/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/container/ApplicationContext.java 2009-03-12
23:38:08 UTC (rev 17602)
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
*/
package org.xwiki.container;
+import java.io.File;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
import java.net.URL;
@@ -27,5 +28,15 @@
public interface ApplicationContext
{
InputStream getResourceAsStream(String resourceName);
+
URL getResource(String resourceName) throws
MalformedURLException;
+
+ /**
+ * Gets the directory which the container must provide for
storing temporary data. The contents of this directory
+ * may be deleted between container restarts (<em>temporary</
em>, as the name implies), so it is not a safe place to
+ * store permanent/important data.
+ *
+ * @return a {@link File} object pointing to a directory that
the application can use for storing temporary files
+ */
+ File getTemporaryDirectory();
I don't like this too much but it's ok for now. However I don't think
this is a good generic solution for the future. I think it would be
better to implement a temporary storage that uses the same storage
api
as the other storages (main storage, version storage, attachment
storage, etc). The pb with returning a File is that 1) it ties us
to a
disk storage which might not be available in all environments for
various reasons and 2) it's not extensible and you cannot swap
another
implementation (like it you want to use a memory storage for
example).
For this we need the new storage/model of course which is why it's ok
to have this now.
WDYT?
5719
days inactive
5719
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol