+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi devs,
It's a best practice that unit tests must not output anything to the
console.
Rationale:
* It pollutes the maven logs unnecessarily. For example imagine that
you're
expecting an error in your test and that the stacktrace is logged to
the console. When looking at the maven console logs the reader will wonder
if there was an error or if it was expected.
* The test must assert whatever it needs to
validate the code under
test. So if it expects a log to be printed it should assert
it.
In order to make this easy I've just added JUnit LogRule to our commons
test
framework.
Here's a usage example:
public class RestrictParseLocationEventHandlerTest
{
private RestrictParseLocationEventHandler handler = new
RestrictParseLocationEventHandler();
/**
* Capture logs with WARN or higher severity to assert them.
*/
@Rule public LogRule logRule = new LogRule() {{
record(LogLevel.WARN);
recordLoggingForType(RestrictParseLocationEventHandler.class);
}};
@Test
public void includeEventWhenIllegalPath()
{
Assert.assertNull("Template shouldn't have been returned",
this.handler.includeEvent("../WEB-INF/xwiki.cfg",
"xwiki:Main.WebHome", "parse"));
Assert.assertEquals(1, this.logRule.size());
Assert.assertTrue(this.logRule.contains(
"Direct access to template file [/WEB-INF/xwiki.cfg]
refused.
Possible break-in attempt!"));
}
}
So this is a vote to agree on this best practice and to document it on
dev.xwiki.org.
Here's my +1
If you agree then please make sure your tests don't output anything from
now
on and please try fixing the tests you wrote that do...
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs